2015 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccnc.2015.7069427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevation domain measurement and modeling of UMa uplink channel with UE on different floors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the major propagation scenarios are the rooftop diffractions and reflections along the building, most of the MPCs have larger elevation angles compared to LOS, thereby resulting in skewed distribution. Our observations are slightly different from the earlier works in the literature [28], [30], [31], where the EoA was fitted using laplacian distribution.…”
Section: A Angular Spread Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the major propagation scenarios are the rooftop diffractions and reflections along the building, most of the MPCs have larger elevation angles compared to LOS, thereby resulting in skewed distribution. Our observations are slightly different from the earlier works in the literature [28], [30], [31], where the EoA was fitted using laplacian distribution.…”
Section: A Angular Spread Statisticscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…8 and 9 respectively plot the CDF of the elevation and azimuth spreads, combined over the measurements done with UE on different floors. We see that the data fits reasonably well with the log-normal distribution 11 , and is consistent with the observations in [26], [30], [31]. However, the observed angular spreads are smaller than the ones reported in these works.…”
Section: A Angular Spread Statisticssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors in [8] performed measurement at 3, 10, 17, and 60 GHz in the O2I scenario and found that the power attenuation was relatively low and frequency-independent for the non-coated glass windows and was high and increasing with frequency for the coated glass windows. In [9], through a measurement campaign in the UMa I2O scenario at 2.6 GHz, the authors found that the probability distribution function (PDF) parameters of ESA were independent to the UE height and position in the non-line of sight (NLOS) case. The authors in [10] measured the vehicle-to-vehicle channels at 5.3 GHz with a bandwidth of 60 MHz in suburban, urban, and underground parking lot environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we propose an iteration algorithm to identify and model the clusters in an APS, as given in Algorithm 1. The input parameters are the measured APS, parameters of f Lap (φ) for the main cluster, and the power threshold given in (9). The output results are the number of significant clusters and the parameters of f Lap (φ) for the other clusters.…”
Section: ) Localization and Modeling Of Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%