2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2011.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevation of fasting morning glucose relative to hemoglobin A1c in normoglycemic patients treated with niacin and with statins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common adverse effect of niacin is skin flushing, which occurs in the majority of patients 115 . In addition, niacin can cause hepatotoxicity, hyperuricaemia, and hyperglycaemia 116,117 . The induction of hyperglycaemia and new onset diabetes mellitus by high doses of niacin can be harmful in patients with CKD, both with or without diabetes mellitus 118 .…”
Section: Niacinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common adverse effect of niacin is skin flushing, which occurs in the majority of patients 115 . In addition, niacin can cause hepatotoxicity, hyperuricaemia, and hyperglycaemia 116,117 . The induction of hyperglycaemia and new onset diabetes mellitus by high doses of niacin can be harmful in patients with CKD, both with or without diabetes mellitus 118 .…”
Section: Niacinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review demonstrated that niacin, when used alone or in combination with statins, is associated with “modest, transient or reversible” increases in fasting glucose and elevation in hemoglobin A1c (p<0.03) 43 and a retrospective analysis (n=550) of the Duke Lipid Clinic database confirmed these findings. 44 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystalline NiAc dosing seems to raise net plasma FFA levels, due to marked rebound between doses, and induces insulin resistance ( 25,38 ). ER formulations might do better, but reported effects on glucose control are generally either neutral or negative ( 16,17,42,45 ). This could result from a failure of the ER formulations to lower FFA, either on average or at the time point of glucose control assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%