Eliciting extra prominence in read-speech tasks: The effects of different text-highlighting methods on acoustic cues to perceived prominence

Abstract

The research initiative Innovating Speech EliCitation Techniques (INSPECT) aims to describe and quantify how recording methods, situations and materials influence speech production in lab-speech experiments. On this basis, INSPECT aims to develop methods that reliably stimulate specific patterns and styles of speech, like expressive or conversational speech or different types emphatic accents. The present study investigates if and how different text highlighting methods (yellow background, bold, capital letter, italics, and underlining) make speakers reinforce the level of perceived prominence of pitchaccented German target words. Analyzed prominence parameters were F0 level, F0 range, normalized intensity level, and word duration. Results show that text highlighting in fact caused prominence parameters to increase. Based on the prominence sensitivity of the affected parameters and the magnitude of their increase, the tested highlighting strategies form the following order of (descending) effectiveness: (i) italics, (ii) yellow, (iii) bold, (iv) capital letters, and (v) underlining.

Evaluating the Benefit of Highlighting Key Words in Captions for People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

“…Background (color_bg) Chi et al [12]; UPPERCASE (uc) Berger et al [5] Underlining (ul) Vertanen et al [44] Italicized (it) Berger et al [5] Font Size (size)…”