2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliciting public concerns about an emerging energy technology: The case of unconventional shale gas development in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The foregoing research reveals the complex and nuanced ways in which perspectives on this issue are negotiated and emerge -supported by substantial research on public perceptions of UGD (e.g., Anderson and Theodori 2009;Boudet et al 2014;Braiser et al 2013;Clarke et al 2015;Evensen et al 2014b;Evensen 2015a;Evensen and Stedman 2016;Israel et al 2015;Malin 2014;Morrone et al 2015;Perry 2012b;Sangaramoorthy et al 2016;Schafft and Biddle 2015;Stedman et al 2012;Stedman et al 2016;Willow 2014; see Thomas et al 2017 for a review). These findings often contrast with institutional framings of UGD, which can paint public perceptions as misinformed and/or uninformed (Williams et al 2015).…”
Section: Shale Gas Development Public Perceptions and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foregoing research reveals the complex and nuanced ways in which perspectives on this issue are negotiated and emerge -supported by substantial research on public perceptions of UGD (e.g., Anderson and Theodori 2009;Boudet et al 2014;Braiser et al 2013;Clarke et al 2015;Evensen et al 2014b;Evensen 2015a;Evensen and Stedman 2016;Israel et al 2015;Malin 2014;Morrone et al 2015;Perry 2012b;Sangaramoorthy et al 2016;Schafft and Biddle 2015;Stedman et al 2012;Stedman et al 2016;Willow 2014; see Thomas et al 2017 for a review). These findings often contrast with institutional framings of UGD, which can paint public perceptions as misinformed and/or uninformed (Williams et al 2015).…”
Section: Shale Gas Development Public Perceptions and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objects of analysis include effects on employment, income or the property market but also social dynamics [20,22,26,49,53,66,81,114,115,152], local risks, risk perception and risk governance [63,64,90,131,135] or questions of energy justice [41,105]. 3 With regard to discipline, studies in these areas are biased toward sociological approaches and ethnography but also law.…”
Section: Reviewing the Literature On Shale Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shale gas boom has also presented new technical, social, and political challenges [19]. Despite public concern regarding the distributive and procedural equity of natural gas development [20][21][22][23][24], the literature on the social equity implications of natural gas systems is sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%