2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliminating a deflationary trap through superinertial interest rate rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the lower bound constraint is binding. Sugo and Ueda (2008) and Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe (2014) consider alternative interest-rate feedback rules. Schmidt (2016) shows that it is possible to design Ricardian government spending rules that insulate the economy from expectations-driven liquidity traps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the lower bound constraint is binding. Sugo and Ueda (2008) and Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe (2014) consider alternative interest-rate feedback rules. Schmidt (2016) shows that it is possible to design Ricardian government spending rules that insulate the economy from expectations-driven liquidity traps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If ρ = 1, monetary policy corresponds to price-level targeting. If ρ > 1, the monetary policy rule entails a superinertia and a deflationary trap can be eliminated, as is shown by Sugo and Ueda (2008b). Parameter c, an intercept in the equations, illustrates a term premium and/or a natural rate of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figure 1 illustrates that if monetary policy follows a Taylor type of rule, multiple equilibria emerge with two steady states as the crossing points between the policy rule and the Fisher equation. The so-called deflationary steady state emerges, even if commitment to a positive target level of inflation is fully credible.Once the economy gets stuck there, a superinertial monetary policy rule or the price level targeting can eliminate the deflationary trap, as investigated bySugo and Ueda (2008b). Thus, if the deflation continues as a result of the economy being stuck at the deflationary steady state, policy regime shift is the only theoretical way to exit from…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correia et al (2013) show in the context of a New Keynesian model how a mix of distortionary taxes can be used to completely circumvent the zero nominal interest rate bound problem. Alstadheim and Henderson (2006) and Sugo and Ueda (2008) consider steady state equilibria and propose monetary policy rules that eliminate the liquidity trap steady state equilibrium. Schmitt- Grohe and Uribe (2012) and Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe (2014) design interest-rate-rule-based exit strategies from deflationary trajectories towards the liquidity trap steady state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%