2003
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elimination of chlorobenzene vapors from air in a compost‐based biofilter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors proposed that it was the diffusion of VOCs into the aqueous phase of the system that was rate-limiting to biodegradation, suggesting that systems that increase the airflow rate even further may have further increased efficiency. However converse to these observations, the compost-based biofilter tested by Delhoménie and Heitz (2003) had a gross toluene removal efficiency that was proportional not to the airflow rate, but the residence time within the biofilter column. This system was tested at relatively high VOC concentrations only.…”
Section: Phytoremediation and Horticultural Biotechnologycontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The authors proposed that it was the diffusion of VOCs into the aqueous phase of the system that was rate-limiting to biodegradation, suggesting that systems that increase the airflow rate even further may have further increased efficiency. However converse to these observations, the compost-based biofilter tested by Delhoménie and Heitz (2003) had a gross toluene removal efficiency that was proportional not to the airflow rate, but the residence time within the biofilter column. This system was tested at relatively high VOC concentrations only.…”
Section: Phytoremediation and Horticultural Biotechnologycontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…For example, Delhoménie and Heitz [13] used the experimental CO 2 respirometric data to determine the biomass yield coefficient associated with the degradation of chlorobenzene vapors from air in a compost-based biofilter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that styrene is more difficult for the microorganisms to consume because of the vinyl radical attached to the aromatic ring, rather than the methyl radical attached to that of toluene. 33,34 As indicated by Hartmans 35 and observed by Delhoménie et al, 36 depends on the degree of substitution. Delhoménie et al 36 reported that an aromatic ring of six carbons substituted by one methyl (toluene) is easier to biodegrade than the same ring substituted by one chlorine atom (chlorobenzene), which was degraded 25% less than toluene when biofilters were operated under the same operating conditions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Styrene and Toluene Treatment In A Biofilter Pmentioning
confidence: 81%