2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elimination of electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: An evaluation of currently used removal techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
184
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
184
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the use of MATLAB software (The MathWorks, Natick, MA), the EMG signals were band-pass filtered at 35-200 Hz, baseline corrected by subtracting the mean of the signal, and full-wave rectified. The high-pass limit was set to minimize cardiac artifact (Drake and Callaghan 2006). The integrated protocol method was then used with an option for manual override to identify EMG activation onset; this method evaluates the point of maximum difference between the integrated signal and an amplitude-normalized integral of the linear envelope and is less susceptible to changes in baseline amplitude or to false onset detection compared with traditional threshold techniques (Allison 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of MATLAB software (The MathWorks, Natick, MA), the EMG signals were band-pass filtered at 35-200 Hz, baseline corrected by subtracting the mean of the signal, and full-wave rectified. The high-pass limit was set to minimize cardiac artifact (Drake and Callaghan 2006). The integrated protocol method was then used with an option for manual override to identify EMG activation onset; this method evaluates the point of maximum difference between the integrated signal and an amplitude-normalized integral of the linear envelope and is less susceptible to changes in baseline amplitude or to false onset detection compared with traditional threshold techniques (Allison 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…version 7.3) were used to process the EMG and motion data separately. To remove ECG artefact the raw EMG signal was Wrst Wltered using a recursive Wfth-order Butterworth high pass Wlter at a cut-oV frequency of 30 Hz (Butler et al 2007b;Drake and Callaghan 2006;Zhou et al 2007). For each muscle site, the root mean square (RMS) amplitude was calculated during the lift phase.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensing: Data collection starts at the sensors, where a raw signal is generated that contains an indication of a person's affective state. Relevant signals can include both overt and covert bodily signals, such as facial camera recordings, movements, speech samples, and biosignals (e.g., ElectroCardioGraphy (ECG) [100,167,317,322,375,433,434,493,494,498,513,514,585,632,738] or ElectroMyoGraphy (EMG) [133,134,206,277,446,447,664,665,667]). …”
Section: The Closed Loop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%