2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28644-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elimination of Quantifiers and Undecidability in Spatial Logics for Concurrency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a phenomenon was already observed for the spatial logic of CCS [15], where = L coincided with structural congruence up to injective renaming. Non-congruence makes the proof of the converse of Proposition 5.2 much harder than the Howe-like method used e.g.…”
Section: Proposition 52 Let R Be An Intensional Bisimulation Then supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Such a phenomenon was already observed for the spatial logic of CCS [15], where = L coincided with structural congruence up to injective renaming. Non-congruence makes the proof of the converse of Proposition 5.2 much harder than the Howe-like method used e.g.…”
Section: Proposition 52 Let R Be An Intensional Bisimulation Then supporting
confidence: 61%
“…These spatial modalities have an intensional flavor, the properties they express being invariant only for simple spatial rearrangements of the system. Still most of the spatial logics face with decidability problems: it was proved that the basic spatial operators, in combination with temporal operators, generate undecidable logics [11,12,13] even against a finite piece of CCS [14].…”
Section: The Agent Is Nothing More But Its Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the semantics, the same fragment of CCS yields undecidability for other spatial logics, e.g. with a modality encoding communication-based transitions [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%