2002
DOI: 10.1080/09668130220129551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elite (Re)configuration and Politico-economic Performance in Post-socialist Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As an ‘aristocratically intellectual group’, the creative elites are obliged to execute the decisions of the coercive political leadership. They possess the power to influence the public by transmitting information in a one‐way direction through state‐controlled media (Adams and Tomsic, 2002; Griffiths et al ., 2008).…”
Section: Chinese Institutions and The Creative Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an ‘aristocratically intellectual group’, the creative elites are obliged to execute the decisions of the coercive political leadership. They possess the power to influence the public by transmitting information in a one‐way direction through state‐controlled media (Adams and Tomsic, 2002; Griffiths et al ., 2008).…”
Section: Chinese Institutions and The Creative Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pri tom je polazište tvrdnja o inicijalnom postojanju političke elite o kojoj je referisano u sociologiji. Proučavanje primera jugoslovenske političke elite je zanimljivo, jer se ona u pomenutim radovima navodi kao jedinstvena, a u radovima o tranziciji političkih elita u postsocijalističke izbegava se njeno razmatranje (Higli i Pakulski 1995; Linc i Stepan [Linz i Stepan] 1996), ili se piše o tranzicijama na republičkom nivou kao da je elita oduvek bivala baš na toj ravni i da se radilo o unutrašnjoj transformaciji (Iglič i Rus, 2000;Sekulić i Šporer, 2000;Lazić, 2000;Adam i Tomšič, 2002). Kako je više elita nastalo iz jedne (kako se obično tvrdi da je bilo tokom postojanja jugoslovenske države) se ne razmatra.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…10 according to adam and Tomšič, the high level of elite reproduction under LDS was far from beneficial, bringing long-term negative effects, including the establishment of monopolies and rent-seeking behaviour. 11 One of the various mechanisms through which this happened was the transformation of Yugoslav social property, which started in 1989 with the Marković laws. 12 Disputes over the allocation of economic privileges culminated in the 1992 Ownership Transformation act.…”
Section: The Slovenian Transition: Gradualism Immobilism and Elite Preservationmentioning
confidence: 99%