1971
DOI: 10.1070/sm1971v015n01abeh001535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elliptic Equations in Unbounded Domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limiting operators and their interrelation with solvability conditions and with the Fredholm property were first studied in [15], [20], [21] (see also [39]) for differential operators on the real axis, and later for some classes of elliptic operators in R n [8], [25], [26], in cylindrical domains [9], [43], or in some specially constructed domains [6], [7]. Some of these results are obtained for the scalar case, some others for the vector case, under the assumption that the coefficients of the operator stabilize at infinity or without this assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limiting operators and their interrelation with solvability conditions and with the Fredholm property were first studied in [15], [20], [21] (see also [39]) for differential operators on the real axis, and later for some classes of elliptic operators in R n [8], [25], [26], in cylindrical domains [9], [43], or in some specially constructed domains [6], [7]. Some of these results are obtained for the scalar case, some others for the vector case, under the assumption that the coefficients of the operator stabilize at infinity or without this assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proofs of Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.3 from [20] for p = 2 can be generalized for the spaces H k+1,R,p q (R n ) in a similar way. □ Further we establish that the regularity of P(x, D) in R n and condition (10) are not only the necessary conditions but also sufficient for the fulfillment of the a priori estimate (9) in spaces H k,R,p q (R n ). Lemma 3.1 Let k ∈ Z + , q ∈ Q k,R , x 0 ∈ R n and P 0 (x, D) be the differential form (5).…”
Section: A Priori Estimates In Multianisotropic Spacesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Using the last inequality and Lemma 3.1, similarly to the proof of Theorem 2.2 from the work [13], it is easy to check that for a big enough m 0 operators P m (x, D) : H k+1,R,p q (R n ) → H k,R,p q (R n ) for m > m 0 have bounded inverse operators. Since (10) holds they have uniformly bounded norms and with some C 2 > 0 the following holds…”
Section: Hencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since we do not need general dimension in this paper, we omit them here. For interested readers, one may refer to [30] for the pointwise estimates at infinity and to, for example, [31,32,30] for the theories of elliptic equations in unbounded domains.…”
Section: Basic Setup Of Sdesmentioning
confidence: 99%