“…Libration, precession and tidal instabilities have been the subject of numerous studies focusing on their threshold and linear growth (Le Bars et al, 2015, and references therein), and more recently on their nonlinear saturation (e.g., Barker & Lithwick, 2013a;Le Reun et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2015), combining theoretical, experimental, and numerical approaches. The relevance of those alternative sources of core turbulence for terrestrial bodies has also been the subject of several studies (e.g., Grannan et al, 2016;Lemasquerier et al, 2017;Seyed-Mahmoud et al, 2004) and has given birth to unconventional scenarios to explain past or existing dynamos: for example, on Io (Kerswell & Malkus, 1998), on Mars (Arkani-Hamed et al, 2008, on the Moon (Dwyer et al, 2011;Le Bars et al, 2011), and on the early Earth (Andrault et al, 2016). However, studies of the dynamo capability of the flows resulting from libration, precession, and tides have been up to now sparse and limited to idealized or simplified configurations: that is, laminar dynamos from the precession base flow (Ernst-Hullermann et al, 2013), dynamos for tidal instability with ad hoc bulk forcing in a spherical domain (Cébron & Hollerbach, 2014;Vidal et al, 2017), laminar dynamos in a spheroidal domain for precession and libration instabilities (Wu & Roberts, 2009 (but see also Guermond et al, 2013), and turbulent dynamos in a spherical domain for precession (Kida & Shimizu, 2011;Lin et al, 2016;Tilgner, 2005Tilgner, , 2007.…”