Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781444329988.ch24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elton and the economics of biological invasions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological control agents are most frequently introduced in agricultural landscapes. Agro-ecosystems are often simplified ecosystems, with few native species and a low complexity of trophic networks, which makes them highly susceptible to invasion by exotic pests or pathogens ( Shea and Chesson 2002 ; Perrings 2011 ). As such, agro-ecosystems should also be susceptible to invasion by biological control agents, that is, establishment success should be higher in such environments where the low number of resident species leaves wide niche opportunities for potential invaders ( Shea and Chesson 2002 ).…”
Section: Processes Specific To Biological Control Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological control agents are most frequently introduced in agricultural landscapes. Agro-ecosystems are often simplified ecosystems, with few native species and a low complexity of trophic networks, which makes them highly susceptible to invasion by exotic pests or pathogens ( Shea and Chesson 2002 ; Perrings 2011 ). As such, agro-ecosystems should also be susceptible to invasion by biological control agents, that is, establishment success should be higher in such environments where the low number of resident species leaves wide niche opportunities for potential invaders ( Shea and Chesson 2002 ).…”
Section: Processes Specific To Biological Control Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although highly cited owing to a previous lack of invasion cost estimates, Pimentel's figures are not the key area of consensus that Sagoff implies (e.g., Holmes et al. 2009; Perrings 2011). Sagoff ignores more recent economic works that explicitly consider damage‐related costs (Bradshaw et al.…”
Section: Underestimation Of Economic Costs Of Invasionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2009) considered only forests and timber markets. In the other, Perrings (2011) states that the Pimentel et al. (2000, 2005) research “is still the most comprehensive summary of the control costs and lost output associated with invasive species in three productive sectors: agriculture, forestry and fisheries.” This affirmation continues to be the consensus view in invasion biology.…”
Section: Economic Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%