2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-014-9444-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the Construct Validity of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) in a Sample of Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first version of the APSD was a parent and teacher rated assessment of both personality traits and behavior in children. The 20 items of the APSD have also been modified to create a self-report version for use with adolescents (APSD-SR; Caputo et al, 1999; Goodwin et al, 2015; Loney et al, 2003; Wang et al, 2015). Although the APSD and APSD-SR are reportedly based on the PCL, there is a lack of complete agreement between the conceptually similar items of the APSD and the PCL instruments (Dillard et al, 2013; Falkenbach et al, 2003).…”
Section: Youth Psychopathy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first version of the APSD was a parent and teacher rated assessment of both personality traits and behavior in children. The 20 items of the APSD have also been modified to create a self-report version for use with adolescents (APSD-SR; Caputo et al, 1999; Goodwin et al, 2015; Loney et al, 2003; Wang et al, 2015). Although the APSD and APSD-SR are reportedly based on the PCL, there is a lack of complete agreement between the conceptually similar items of the APSD and the PCL instruments (Dillard et al, 2013; Falkenbach et al, 2003).…”
Section: Youth Psychopathy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, when relying on a single informant to rate both the CPTI and external correlates, the pattern of results conformed to theoretical expectations, thereby supporting the validity of both the teacher- and parent-reported CPTI scores in clinic-referred 6- to 13-year-old children. Notwithstanding that single informant approaches and the sole reliance on rating scales to assess external correlates are commonly applied strategies in psychometric evaluations of psychopathy (Colins, Noom, & Vanderplasschen, 2012; Goodwin, Sellbom, & Salekin, 2015) and CU rating scales (e.g., Colins et al, 2016; Essau, Sasagawa, & Frick, 2006), such strategies might artificially inflate the correlation magnitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antisocial behavior and psychopathic traits were quantitatively estimated using the APSD, a 20‐item questionnaire based on the Psychopathy Checklist‐revised (PCL‐R; Frick & Hare, 2001; Goodwin, Sellbom, & Salekin, 2015). APSD measures antisocial behavior and psychopathic traits with regards to impulsivity, narcissism, and callousness‐unemotionality, which has been extended to younger adults (Goodwin et al, 2015). Recent studies have shown that APSD is reliable and valid for subjects from different countries (de Wied, van der Baan, Raaijmakers, de Ruiter, & Meeus, 2014; Goulter, Kimonis, & Heller, 2018; Li, Chan, Ang, & Huan, 2017; Pechorro, Maroco, Poiares, & Vieira, 2013), including China (Wang, Deng, Armour, Bi, & Zeng, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two senior psychiatrists assessed the ASB severity for all the subjects. The antisocial behavior and psychopathic traits were quantitatively estimated using the APSD, a 20‐item questionnaire based on the Psychopathy Checklist‐revised (PCL‐R; Frick & Hare, 2001; Goodwin, Sellbom, & Salekin, 2015). APSD measures antisocial behavior and psychopathic traits with regards to impulsivity, narcissism, and callousness‐unemotionality, which has been extended to younger adults (Goodwin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%