2015
DOI: 10.5709/acp-0166-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the Functional Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Psychometric Intelligence: A Fixed-Links Modeling Approach for Experimental Repeated-Measures Designs

Abstract: Numerous studies reported a strong link between working memory capacity (WMC) and fluid intelligence (Gf), although views differ in respect to how close these two constructs are related to each other. In the present study, we used a WMC task with five levels of task demands to assess the relationship between WMC and Gf by means of a new methodological approach referred to as fixed-links modeling. Fixed-links models belong to the family of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and are of particular interest for ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These sources remained constantly effective across the three Hick conditions and, thus, caused individual differences in reaction time independently of the experimental manipulation. These sources of constant influence might comprise basic processing speed (e.g., Heitz, Unsworth, & Engle, 2005 ), basal speed of sensorimotor processing (e.g., Jensen, 2006 ; Schweizer, 2007 ), or also subjective state variables such as the motivation to perform or current levels of individual fatigue (e.g., Thomas et al, 2015 ). The obtained fixed-links model fit the data well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These sources remained constantly effective across the three Hick conditions and, thus, caused individual differences in reaction time independently of the experimental manipulation. These sources of constant influence might comprise basic processing speed (e.g., Heitz, Unsworth, & Engle, 2005 ), basal speed of sensorimotor processing (e.g., Jensen, 2006 ; Schweizer, 2007 ), or also subjective state variables such as the motivation to perform or current levels of individual fatigue (e.g., Thomas et al, 2015 ). The obtained fixed-links model fit the data well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Schweizer, 2007 , 2008 ). This latent variable includes, for example, general (i.e., task-independent) SIP such as perceptual and motor speed ( Schweizer, 2007 ; Stauffer, Troche, Schweizer, & Rammsayer, 2014 ) or an individual’s general state of alertness, fatigue, or motivation ( Thomas, Rammsayer, Schweizer, & Troche, 2015 ). In contrast to the slope-intercept approach, the fixed-links approach is not affected by suppression effects, since the correlation between the experimental and the nonexperimental latent variable is explicitly set to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, a reanalysis focused on the outcomes of latent-variable studies found stronger correlation between WM capacity and Gf (median r = 0.72), indicating that the WM capacity and Gf constructs share approximately 50% of their variance (Kane et al, 2005). A strong link between WM and Gf have also been confirmed by subsequent studies (e.g., Cochrane et al, 2019;Colom et al, 2015;Jastrzębski et al, 2018;Rey-Mermet et al, 2019;Rose, 2013;Smoleń & Chuderski, 2015;Thomas et al, 2015). This link, observed at the behavioural level, is also supported by data on neuronal mechanisms shared by Gf and WM, primarily involving the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex and fronto-parietal network (Barbey et al, 2014;Burgess et al, 2011;Dehn, 2017;Eriksson et al, 2015;Gray et al, 2003;Kane & Engle, 2002).…”
Section: Relationship Between Working Memory and Fluid Intelligencementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Al estudiar la inteligencia, principalmente relacionada con el desempeño académico, numerosas investigaciones abordan los dominios específicos de razonamiento numérico (rn), verbal (rv) y espacial (re) (Bresgi, Alexander, & Seabi, 2017;Schillinger, Vogel, Diedrich, & Grabner, 2018;Thomas, Rammsayer, Schweizer, & Troche, 2015;van de Weijer-Bergsma, Kroesbergen, & van Luit, 2015). El rn permite, fundamentalmente, comprender relaciones y conceptos numéricos; el rv remite a las capacidades de las personas en la comprensión del lenguaje (Gambari, Kutigi, & Fagbemi, 2014), y el re a encontrar relaciones entre formas y figuras (Wai, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified