2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EM-KDE: A locality-aware job scheduling policy with distributed semantic caches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey (Qureshi et al, 2013) provides valuable insights in learning various types of semantic search modes and the behavior of existing semantic search engines. Another work (Eom et al, 2015) proposed scheduling policies in the context of distributed query processing. The policies are based on the dynamic details of caching infrastructure for distributed systems and apply the statistical prediction techniques into scheduling policies for query processing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey (Qureshi et al, 2013) provides valuable insights in learning various types of semantic search modes and the behavior of existing semantic search engines. Another work (Eom et al, 2015) proposed scheduling policies in the context of distributed query processing. The policies are based on the dynamic details of caching infrastructure for distributed systems and apply the statistical prediction techniques into scheduling policies for query processing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile Internet to achieve large amounts of data, query data is a multi-node distributed storage and the real-time transaction scheduling, the existing methods generally part of the query task is decomposed into sub transactions and the sub-transaction put in different nodes were treated, the priority assessment, consensus sequence of problems [6] [7]. Improve the efficiency of distributed database transaction real-time scheduling, and optimize the decomposition process of the transaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%