1964
DOI: 10.1086/223733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embarrassment and the Analysis of Role Requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This becomes abundantly clear when our bodies let us down. We stammer in an important meeting or blush when we make a mistake thereby drawing attention to our uncertainty or embarrassment and undermining our role performance (Gross and Stone 1964). One of the important ways in which the bodies of people who are chronically ill affect self and identity is the ways in which they may do this.…”
Section: Biological Contingencies and Human Socialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This becomes abundantly clear when our bodies let us down. We stammer in an important meeting or blush when we make a mistake thereby drawing attention to our uncertainty or embarrassment and undermining our role performance (Gross and Stone 1964). One of the important ways in which the bodies of people who are chronically ill affect self and identity is the ways in which they may do this.…”
Section: Biological Contingencies and Human Socialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is typically a discrepancy between the persona that one wants to enact and that which one fears one has actually communicated (Edelmann, 1987), or between the impressions consciously "given" and those unintentionally "given off" (Goffman, 1959, p. 14). At the situational level, meanwhile, a collective sense of embarrassment emerges when a central assumption of interaction is unexpectedly or unqualifiedly discredited, because one or more actors cannot fulfill their role requirements (Gross & Stone, 1964). This may result from a loss of poise (mistaken identity claims, invasions of private territory, loss of control over the body or material props), an inappropriate identity performance (where the actor's "announcement" of their identity does not match the normative expectations of the audience and their "placement" of her or him) (Stone, 1962), or an inconsistent identity performance, where two or more roles contradict each other (a dominant role may be undermined by an adjunct, reserve, or relic identity from another setting) À all of which create a loss of script and general uncertainty over how to perform (Gross & Stone, 1964).…”
Section: Role Conflict Embarrassment and Dramaturgical Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, -the individual is always in jeopardy because of the adventitious linking of events, the vulnerability of his body, and the need in social situations to maintain the proprieties‖ (Goffman 1967:169); failure leads to embarrassment-a deficit in projecting an acceptable self before others (Goffman 1967;Gross and Stone 1964;Weinberg 1968;Weinberg and Williams 2005). Some of these recollections of olfactory abjection owe to accidental circumstances.…”
Section: Olfactory Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%