2015
DOI: 10.1021/ct5011032
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded Mean-Field Theory

Abstract: We introduce embedded mean-field theory (EMFT), an approach that flexibly allows for the embedding of one mean-field theory in another without the need to specify or fix the number of particles in each subsystem. EMFT is simple, is well-defined without recourse to parameters, and inherits the simple gradient theory of the parent mean-field theories. In this paper, we report extensive benchmarking of EMFT for the case where the subsystems are treated using different levels of Kohn-Sham theory, using PBE or B3LY… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
195
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, methods based on localized molecular orbitals lead to complicated implementations for analytical gradients and properties, while many embedding methods place constraints on the subsystem particle numbers, spin state, and spatial extent of the excitation, or they neglect particle-number fluctuations between subsystems, or the environmental response to the excitation. Removing such constraints has motivated the recent development of embedding strategies that are formally exact in the description of subsystem interactions [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and allow for particle-number fluctuations between subsystems via their description as open quantum systems. [35][36][37] Here, we introduce time-dependent embedded mean-field theory (TD-EMFT), a linear-response approach to describe excited electronic states using the EMFT framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, methods based on localized molecular orbitals lead to complicated implementations for analytical gradients and properties, while many embedding methods place constraints on the subsystem particle numbers, spin state, and spatial extent of the excitation, or they neglect particle-number fluctuations between subsystems, or the environmental response to the excitation. Removing such constraints has motivated the recent development of embedding strategies that are formally exact in the description of subsystem interactions [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and allow for particle-number fluctuations between subsystems via their description as open quantum systems. [35][36][37] Here, we introduce time-dependent embedded mean-field theory (TD-EMFT), a linear-response approach to describe excited electronic states using the EMFT framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing such constraints has motivated the recent development of embedding strategies that are formally exact in the description of subsystem interactions [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and allow for particle-number fluctuations between subsystems via their description as open quantum systems. [35][36][37] Here, we introduce time-dependent embedded mean-field theory (TD-EMFT), a linear-response approach to describe excited electronic states using the EMFT framework. 37,38 TD-EMFT provides subsystem embedding at different levels of mean-field theory, avoiding the need to specify or fix the particle number or spin state for each subsystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 and 12, with geometries obtained from Ref. 10, except for the bond length of OH , which is 0.978 Å as given in Ref. 12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If no carbon atoms are in the active subsystem, the reaction energy error is the difference between the reaction energies computed at the high and low levels of theory. 10 The first test case is a simple substitution reaction in which chlorodecane reacts with a hydroxide anion to form decanol and a chloride anion [ Fig. 1(a)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%