Proceedings of Eurosensors 2017, Paris, France, 3–6 September 2017 2017
DOI: 10.3390/proceedings1040600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded Wearable Integrating Real-Time Processing of Electromyography Signals

Abstract: Abstract:We realized a non-invasive wearable device able to record muscle activity using patch electrodes positioned on the skin over the muscle. It is an integrated system-on-board developed for the detection of several physical and physiologic human parameters which includes specific circuits for detecting the surface electromyography signal and algorithms for the real-time data processing optimized to low computational load. In real time, the proposed system dissipates only 26 mW and guarantees 20 h battery… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first method is the classical detection method which compares the rectified and filtered sEMG signal with a predefined threshold, where this method was used in most of the practical implemented hand robotic devices [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The second method is the Teager Kaiser Energy Operator (TKE) [7][8][9][10]26] and the third method is the Integrated Profile (IP) [13,27] of the sEMG signal. These three methods were chosen because they can be implemented in real time and have low computational efforts.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Between the Fla-mse Algorithm And Thrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method is the classical detection method which compares the rectified and filtered sEMG signal with a predefined threshold, where this method was used in most of the practical implemented hand robotic devices [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The second method is the Teager Kaiser Energy Operator (TKE) [7][8][9][10]26] and the third method is the Integrated Profile (IP) [13,27] of the sEMG signal. These three methods were chosen because they can be implemented in real time and have low computational efforts.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Between the Fla-mse Algorithm And Thrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used in EMG processing, for instance in [33] where a complete gesture recognition system on a ARM cortex-M4 microcontroller is implemented with a SVM used to recognize up to 7 hand gestures with a 8 channel EMG setup. Other works based on this architecture are presented in [36] and in [37] where an ANN with one hidden layer is implemented on a 4 EMG channel setup and it is capable to recognize up to 10 gestures with accuracy higher than 80%. Other works rely on more powerful platforms, to implement more complex models, like the one presented in [34], which leverages an ARM Cortex-A8 processor to execute the EMG gesture recognition using non linear modeling approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are based on the values summarized in Table II, where we also show the current consumption of the system in streaming mode, with up to 9 h of autonomy, and sleep/standby (up to 1000 h). While it is difficult to compare wearable systems directly, it is still noticeable that SoA systems for EMG gesture recognition have a battery life ranging from 3 to 11h [21], [22], [13], independently from the algorithm that is used. As explained above, our architecture is capable of providing around 2x more autonomy with a tiny 60 mAh battery, offering superior performance and unintrusive form factor.…”
Section: Power Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More efficient solutions, such as [13] and [14] are based on dedicated industrial IoT microcontrollers (i.e. ARM CORTEX M4) and provide up to 10 hours with a 100 mAh LiPo battery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%