2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1703.07532
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded-width: A variant of treewidth for plane graphs

Abstract: We define a special case of tree decompositions for planar graphs that respect a given embedding of the graph. We study the analogous width of the resulting decomposition we call the embedded-width of a plane graph. We show both upper bounds and lower bounds for the embedded-width of a graph in terms of its treewidth and describe a fixed parameter tractable algorithm to calculate the embedded-width of a plane graph. To do so, we give novel bounds on the size of matchings in planar graphs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we have cw(δ(G)) ≤ (G)(tw(G) + 2). Finally, the embedded-width emw(G) of G satisfies the relations: emw(G) ≥ and emw(G) ≥ tw(G), by definition [14,26]. Combining the above inequalities, we get the stated bound for the carving-width of δ(G).…”
Section: Lemma 18mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we have cw(δ(G)) ≤ (G)(tw(G) + 2). Finally, the embedded-width emw(G) of G satisfies the relations: emw(G) ≥ and emw(G) ≥ tw(G), by definition [14,26]. Combining the above inequalities, we get the stated bound for the carving-width of δ(G).…”
Section: Lemma 18mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A tree decomposition of an embedded graph G respects the embedding of G if, for every face f of G, at least one bag contains all the vertices of f [14]. The embedded-width emw(G) of G is the minimum width of any of its tree decompositions that respect the embedding of G. For consistency with other graph-width parameters, in the original definition of this width measure [14] the vertices of the outer face are not required to be in some bag. Here, we adopt the variant presented in [26], where the tree decomposition must also include a bag containing the outer face.…”
Section: Embedded-widthmentioning
confidence: 99%