“…Compared to noble metals, supported Ni nanoparticle (NP) catalysts are more desirable due to their high selectivity, promising activity, cheaper price, and increased abundance. ,– Although the bare Ni NPs often have accompanied by disadvantages such as low stability (coalescence/sintering phenomenon) in high temperatures and poor performance at low temperatures, in order to overcome such problems, it is proposed to use the second metal due to the reinforcing synergistic effects , and choose suitable support that contains high dispersion potential or defect sites to create good interaction and electron transfer between the active metal and support. So far, various supports, including Al 2 O 3 , ZrO 2 , CeO 2 , zeolites, MgO, hydrotalcites, and natural clays, have been investigated due to some of their good properties. ,– The efficiency of CO 2 methanation often did not stay satisfactory in reaction conditions for the mentioned supports because of the temperature increase and subsequently the sintering process of nickel particles in them, which decreased the performance and selectivity of the catalyst during the reaction. ,, Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have proven to be promising catalysts or supports/precursors in a variety of applications, including gases conversion, , separation and storage, ,– energy, , sensing, , magnetics, , biomedicine, – and antibacterial, – due to a series of their unique features, containing porous and adjustable structures with defect sites, functional groups, and a high surface area that provide the potential for good interaction and dispersion of catalytic NPs with the substrate. Also, another valuable feature of MOFs is the encapsulation of metal particles into their nanopores, therefore controlling the size and morphology of metal NPs and preventing their aggregation. , To the best of our knowledge, MOFs were used for the first time by Zhen et al as emerging catalysts for CO 2 conversion to CH 4 in 2015 .…”