Embedding lived experience into mental health academic research organizations: Critical reflections

Abstract

Background: As part of a growing emphasis on engaging people with lived experience of mental health conditios in mental health research, there are increasing calls to consider and embed lived experience throughout academic research institutes. This extends beyond the engagement of lay patients and also considers the potential roles of academic researchers with lived experience. When the lived experience of academic researchers is applied to academic work, there is the potential to improve the relevance of the research, while destigmatizing mental illness within academia. However, there are different and often contrasting perspectives on the way a lived experience academic researcher initiative should be implemented.Objectives: This article describes some of the key issues to be considered when planning an initiative that leverages and values the lived experience of academic researchers, including the advantages and disadvantages of each potential approach.Discussion & Recommendations: Institutions are encouraged to reflect on the ways that they might support and value lived experience among academic researchers. In developing any such initiative, institutions are encouraged to be transparent about their objectives and values, undertake a careful planning process, involve researchers with lived experience from the outset and consistently challenge the stigma experienced by academic researchers with lived experience.

The League: A person‐centred approach to the development of social robotics for paediatric anxiety

“…As such, we incorporate this language to maintain our link to these professional bodies. However, others have reported that the word ‘patient’ can pose a barrier to engagement with lived experience experts; by emphasizing illness or deficit rather than expertise, the term can be seen as undervaluing and disrespecting these individual's contributions to research and to the engagement process 43 . We spoke with three of the ongoing League members about this topic.…”

Digital Mental Health for Schizophrenia and Other Severe Mental Illnesses: An International Consensus on Current Challenges and Potential Solutions

“…In addition, more fundamental organizational changes are needed to underpin necessary changes to funding and research study approaches. Participants with lived experience and academic experts do not always “speak the same language” [ 136 ], so awareness of differences in expression and the need to work together to solve health problems is necessary to minimize the impact of power imbalances and promote coproduction [ 137 ]. This can be achieved by developing safe spaces to create and share knowledge [ 138 ] and allow for opportunities for researchers and participants with lived experience to learn and enrich their own expertise from the experience of informed participation and collaboration [ 49 ].…”

Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis

“…The term ‘patient engagement’ is only used for clarity purposes as it is commonly used in health research. In response to the expressed preferences of our lived experience panel, we refer to people with lived experience engaged in research projects as PWLE instead of the term ‘patient’—this is for clarity purposes; it should be noted that researchers can also identify as PWLE and apply their lived experience to research 27,28 …”