2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20975-8_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedding Methods for Bubble-Sort, Pancake, and Matrix-Star Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…into it with expansion 1 and dilation 7. Also, the average dilation of the star graph S 2n is smaller than 3 and the bubble sort graph B 2n is smaller than 4 [5,11]. This paper analyzes an embedding algorithm from a matrix-star graph MS 2,n to a transposition graph T 2n .…”
Section: One Of the Important Interconnection Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…into it with expansion 1 and dilation 7. Also, the average dilation of the star graph S 2n is smaller than 3 and the bubble sort graph B 2n is smaller than 4 [5,11]. This paper analyzes an embedding algorithm from a matrix-star graph MS 2,n to a transposition graph T 2n .…”
Section: One Of the Important Interconnection Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 2shows an example of MS 2,2 , in which the nodes are represented by 2×2 matrices[11]. The terms node and matrix are interchangeably used in this paper because a node is expressed by a matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%