2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.063512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EmbeddingR+R2inflation in supergravity

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
104
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superfield description of the R + R 2 theory in the context of N = 1 and N = 2 supergravities have been considered by Ketov and collaborators [8,9,10]. However, in the N = 2 case, the proposed standard supergravity dual fails to describe the scalaron multiplet and the corresponding potential for the reasons outlined in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The superfield description of the R + R 2 theory in the context of N = 1 and N = 2 supergravities have been considered by Ketov and collaborators [8,9,10]. However, in the N = 2 case, the proposed standard supergravity dual fails to describe the scalaron multiplet and the corresponding potential for the reasons outlined in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A different approach to Starobinsky inflation in supergravity has been followed in Refs. [8] where appropriate F-supergravity extension of f(R) gravity has been employed, dual to the standard approach in terms of Kähler potentials and superpotentials.…”
Section: Starobinsky Model In the Old-minimal Supergravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when higher derivatives appear, this duality does not work and the two theories are different. Earlier [7,8] and recent [10][11][12] embeddings of the Starobinsky model have been all based on the old-minimal formulation of N = 1 supergravity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, there has been a a renewed interest on the Starobinsky model, with particular emphasis on its supergravity extensions [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], along the lines originated in Refs. [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%