2010
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-10-10425-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embeddings of $k$-connected $n$-manifolds into $\mathbb {R}^{2n-k-1}$

Abstract: Abstract. We obtain estimations for isotopy classes of embeddings of closed k-connected n-manifolds into R 2n−k−1 for n ≥ 2k + 6 and k ≥ 0. This is done in terms of an exact sequence involving the Whitney invariants and an explicitly constructed action of H k+1 (N ; Z 2 ) on the set of embeddings. The proof involves a reduction to the classification of embeddings of a punctured manifold and uses the parametric connected sum of embeddings.Corollary. Suppose that N is a closed almost parallelizable k-connected n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sum operation on E m (S p × S q ) is 'S p -parametric connected sum', cf. [19,26,31], [33, theorem 8]. See accurate definitions in § 2.1; cf.…”
Section: Statements Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sum operation on E m (S p × S q ) is 'S p -parametric connected sum', cf. [19,26,31], [33, theorem 8]. See accurate definitions in § 2.1; cf.…”
Section: Statements Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification of knotted tori is a natural next step after the Haefliger link theory [12] and the classification of embeddings of highly-connected manifolds [27, § 2], [15]. Such a step gives some insight or even precise information concerning embeddings of arbitrary manifolds [26,31,33], and reveals new interesting relations to algebraic topology.…”
Section: Some General Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an isotopy R t i ψ R t between i ψ and i ψ. By the standardization lemma of [29,33] there is a standardized representativeḡ of g. Then a representativeh of g +[i]ψ is defined by ( * * ) forf ,ḡ, s replaced byḡ, i ψ , i, respectively. We haveh =ḡ =ḡψ on In this subsection we denote by the same letter a symmetric autodiffeomorphism of T p,q and its restriction S p × D q ± → S p × D q ± .…”
Section: Definition Of the Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of theorem 1.16. By the standardization lemma of [29,33] there are s-standardized and i-standardized representativesf of f andḡ of g, respectively. Then a representativeh of f # s g is defined by ( * * ).…”
Section: (B) We Havementioning
confidence: 99%