2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodied Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) comparison of residential building retrofit measures in Atlanta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper concludes that an "advanced refurbishment" would provide 17% embodied and 9% total greenhouse gas savings compared to new construction complying with contemporary standards. In contrast, [47] identified an increase of approximately 20% in EEIs of residential building renovations in USA. This increase was outweighed by only 1.6 to 5 years of resulting operational energy savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The paper concludes that an "advanced refurbishment" would provide 17% embodied and 9% total greenhouse gas savings compared to new construction complying with contemporary standards. In contrast, [47] identified an increase of approximately 20% in EEIs of residential building renovations in USA. This increase was outweighed by only 1.6 to 5 years of resulting operational energy savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are several other publications such as [44][45][46] dealing with this field, but this number is still negligible compared to the thousands of publications describing other building-related LCAs. Moreover, only a few of these publications analysed the efficiency of renovations in comparison to new construction: eight papers cited in [11], five in [31], and handful of others, such as [46,47]. Overall, these studies confirm that the renovation of existing (especially older) buildings can significantly reduce environmental impacts related to their life cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are several approaches to reduce the energy consumption of buildings, which can be classified into two main groups: those based on “passive” strategies, understanding “passive” as those ones that do not require an active management of the building, as the improvement of building envelopes [ 11 ], the replacement of systems (HVAC, DHW, etc.) with more efficient ones [ 12 ], the use of renewable energies, etc. ; and those based on “active” strategies that basically try to achieve an optimal management of the building as a whole [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate models for energy consumption prediction are important in buildings energy planning and optimization, energy monitoring, efficient building operation, etc. [4,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%