2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-008-9133-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodied Semiotic Activities and Their Role in the Construction of Mathematical Meaning of Motion Graphs

Abstract: This paper examines the relation between bodily actions, artifact-mediated activities, and semiotic processes that students experience while producing and interpreting graphs of two-dimensional motion in the plane. We designed a technology-based setting that enabled students to engage in embodied semiotic activities and experience two modes of interaction: 2D freehand motion and 2D synthesized motion, designed by the composition of single variable function graphs. Our theoretical framework combines two perspec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An understanding of graphing, however, involves not only interpretation and translation but also construction. Although technological advances such as graphing calculators and computer programs promote exploration and understanding of functions (e.g., Ainley, Nardi, & Pratt, 2000; Botzer & Yerushalmy, 2008; Hennessy, Fung, & Scanlon, 2001; Kieran, 2001; Levert, 2003; Nicolaou, Nicolaidou, & Zacharia, 2007; Noble, Nemirovsky, Dimattia, & Wright, 2004; Schwartz & Hershkowitz, 1999), they do not always help students gain a full understanding of function (Schoenfeld, Smith, & Arcavi, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An understanding of graphing, however, involves not only interpretation and translation but also construction. Although technological advances such as graphing calculators and computer programs promote exploration and understanding of functions (e.g., Ainley, Nardi, & Pratt, 2000; Botzer & Yerushalmy, 2008; Hennessy, Fung, & Scanlon, 2001; Kieran, 2001; Levert, 2003; Nicolaou, Nicolaidou, & Zacharia, 2007; Noble, Nemirovsky, Dimattia, & Wright, 2004; Schwartz & Hershkowitz, 1999), they do not always help students gain a full understanding of function (Schoenfeld, Smith, & Arcavi, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive development occurring in such symbolic-reconstructive learning is considered to be a sophisticated way of knowing (Arzarello, Robutti, & Bazzini, 2005). Related to this theoretical framework and in conjunction with development of interactive technology tools, studies in mathematics education emphasize that sensual cognition is essential in the learning process of mathematical concepts (to mention only a few works that are related to the learning of calculus: Arzarello et al, 2005;Bartolini Bussi & Mariotti, 2008;Botzer & Yerushalmy, 2008;Tall, 2009). The case study that we discuss in the present article occurred in settings that support perceptual-motor engagement of students mediated by a computerized artifact and a task designed to lead to the appropriation of particular mathematics content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Celine made use of iconic representational gestures (Roth 2001). Botzer and Yerushalmy (2008) argue how such gestures imply that Celine mentally stretched the graph in order to compare it with the original one, thus revealing her perceptual-motor and analytical thinking (see, e.g. Robutti 2006).…”
Section: The Role Of Perceptual-motor Experiences In Developing Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%