2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodying intimate war: A reply to Sjoberg, Massaro and Bernazzoli

Abstract: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…She proposes a multi-scalar geopolitics of intimacy in which the site, instead of the event or magnitude, situates terror acts as ‘attempts to exert political control through fear’ (531) both domestically and globally. As such her emphasis on the intimate as an embodied spatiality offers ways for this study to explore the micro-geopolitics ‘of emotions as political forces’ (Pain, 2014b, 2015a, 2015b: 73) mediated across scale and via objects (Ahmed, 2004; Fanghanel, 2014) of Istanbul’s (half)built environment.…”
Section: Spatialising Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…She proposes a multi-scalar geopolitics of intimacy in which the site, instead of the event or magnitude, situates terror acts as ‘attempts to exert political control through fear’ (531) both domestically and globally. As such her emphasis on the intimate as an embodied spatiality offers ways for this study to explore the micro-geopolitics ‘of emotions as political forces’ (Pain, 2014b, 2015a, 2015b: 73) mediated across scale and via objects (Ahmed, 2004; Fanghanel, 2014) of Istanbul’s (half)built environment.…”
Section: Spatialising Violencementioning
confidence: 99%