Embolization of Atrial Septal Defect Occluder Device into the Left Ventricle- Emergency Surgical Removal

Raha, Shankar Kumar; Sarker, Swadesh Ranjan; Ahmed, Ats; Islam, Zahidul; Karim, Rezaul; Hasan, Kamrul

doi:10.3329/uhj.v10i2.26129

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most cases of embolization occur during the early learning curve of the operators. This complication reduces with increasing of operator experience and the use of TEE during implantation 19 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Short-term outcomes after surgical versus trans catheter closure of atrial septal defects; a study from Iran

Askari

Soraya

Ayremlu

et al. 2018

The Egyptian Heart Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesAtrial Septal Defect (ASD) accounts for 10% of congenital cardiac defects. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the short-term outcomes of surgical versus trans catheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients who had surgical or trans catheter ASD closure. ASD closure outcomes such as hospital cost, length of hospital and ICU stay, residual ASDs, complications, readmission, hospital and three month mortality were recorded and compared.ResultsBetween March 2010 and March 2016, total of 102 secundum ASD patients were treated in our center (71 patients surgical ASD closure and 31 patients trans catheter ASD closure). About 13.9% of patients (5/36) in the device group had failed procedural attempt for various reasons and these patients underwent surgery closure. Complete closure was observed in 26 of 31 patients (83.9%) in the device group and in 70 of 71 patients in the surgery group (98.6%). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.56 days for surgical group and 2.06 days for device group. The procedure cost for surgery was found to be 5.7% lower than trans catheter closure (patient payment). The complication rates were 18.3% for surgical group and 25.8% for the device group. Readmission after discharge was more common in surgery group (11.2 vs 6.4%). Hospital and three months mortality in both groups were zero.ConclusionsBoth trans catheter and surgical procedure are good methods of successful ASD closure. Considering that the surgical group patients were higher risk patients, mean total hospital cost of patient's procedures were significantly higher in device closure group, failed intervention rate and residual ASD were more common in device group and complications of device group were more serious; thus, appropriate patient selection is an important factor for successful device closure.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%