example, hepatocellular carcinoma). In this regard, we did not exclude patients with high MELD (range in our study 5 to 28) nor did we omit patients with renal insufficiency. This allowed a clear and unbiased evaluation of feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the intervention in a broad range of a homogenous group of patients. Based on this uncensored approach, we were able to perform uni-and multivariate analysis in a large enough population and make an estimate of the ideal cutoff point of the MELD score, which was retained as one of the predictive factors of recurrence of encephalopathy.Third, our series also comprised sufficient follow-up to appreciate the long-term effect of intervention (overall follow-up in our series postembolization: 697 6 157 days).Overall, we appreciate that Singh et al. have substantiated our findings, namely, that embolization of large spontaneous portosystemic shunts for a refractory condition is feasible, safe, and effective. On the other hand, one should keep in mind that embolization of large spontaneous portosystemic shunts for a refractory condition should be reserved for a group of well-selected patients with sufficient critical functional liver mass (indirectly reflected by a MELD score 11) and should be done by a team with substantial experience to perform and manage these kinds of procedures.