2010
DOI: 10.1159/000322607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embracing Complexity in the Study of Acculturation Gaps: Directions for Future Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Costigan (2010) points out the need to move beyond difference scores in studying acculturation discrepancy and towards a method of modeling discrepancy that takes into account the multilevel structure of dyads. Therefore, multilevel modeling was used to estimate the acculturation discrepancy scores for parent-adolescent dyads in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costigan (2010) points out the need to move beyond difference scores in studying acculturation discrepancy and towards a method of modeling discrepancy that takes into account the multilevel structure of dyads. Therefore, multilevel modeling was used to estimate the acculturation discrepancy scores for parent-adolescent dyads in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criticism of the model includes its neglect of the wider context in which parent–child dyads sit [51]. To use Bronfenbrenner’s terminology, in the context of the Somali Bantu participants in these focus groups, this wider context includes other members of the family microsystem, such as siblings; the youth’s mesosystem, including the children’s school; aspects of the exosystem, such as the help given to refugee families by government assistance projects, and the broader macrosystem in which all residents in the United States operate, such as wider political climate [10, 11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another criticism of acculturation-gap distress model research is the isolated focus on parent–child dyads [51]. This current study moves beyond such a narrow scope and considers the impact of sibling relationships in the cultural negotiation process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parent–child acculturation discrepancy has mostly been studied using cross-sectional data from the adolescent and just one parent in the family, usually the mother (Costigan 2010). The current study used longitudinal data to examine parent–child acculturation discrepancy as an ongoing risk factor for adolescent delinquency, and explored possible variations of this effect between more and less discrepant parent–adolescent dyads in terms of how their different acculturation levels might affect the functions within each family group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the effect of parent–child acculturation discrepancy without considering the family context may yield inconclusive results, as the dynamics in each of the parent–child dyads within a family are interdependent (Costigan 2010; Minuchin 1985). For example, an acculturation discrepancy with one parent may not influence family functioning if there is a great deal of tension between the child and the other parent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%