1982
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(82)90025-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryo transfer as a means of controlling the transmission of viral infections. I. The exposure of preimplantation bovine embryos to akabane, bluetongue and bovine viral diarrhea viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They provide further evidence that the properties ofthe zona pellucida of the in vitro-produced embryo are different from those of the in vivo embryo in terms of potential BVDV transmission (Singh andothers 1982, Bielanski andHare 1988). Whether BVDV can fully penetrate the zona (as suggested by Brownlie and others 1997) or whether it merely adheres to the zona of in vitro-produced embryos (Vanroose and others 1998) is still undear.…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…They provide further evidence that the properties ofthe zona pellucida of the in vitro-produced embryo are different from those of the in vivo embryo in terms of potential BVDV transmission (Singh andothers 1982, Bielanski andHare 1988). Whether BVDV can fully penetrate the zona (as suggested by Brownlie and others 1997) or whether it merely adheres to the zona of in vitro-produced embryos (Vanroose and others 1998) is still undear.…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The BVDV indicated that embryos produced using in vitro maturation and IVF from infected cattle (whose FF and cumulus-oocyte complexes were positive for virus) remained negative for the virus after at least 7 days (34). There are many more studies where bovine embryos were exposed to several types of viruses (acabane virus, bovine leukemia virus, bluetongue virus, BVDV, and foot-and-mouth disease virus) and the pathogen was not detected on the embryo (22,23,(35)(36)(37)(38). In another study, Van Soom et al (39) reported isolation of BVDV from FF of donors selected for IVF and in culture media used for production of IVF embryos.…”
Section: Embryosmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Whatever the reason, these studies indicate that the risk for disease transmission from embryos is quite low. It should also be pointed out that the ART techniques (i.e., IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI], embryo transfer) suspected of being at risk for disease transmission are actually used as tools in the livestock industry to reduce disease transmission in diseased animals because of the ability to produce pathogen-free oocytes, embryos, and sperm (22,23).…”
Section: Risks Of Cross-contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the zona pellucida protects the early embryo from SFV and RV infection. Prevention of virus entry by the zona pellucida is not unique to SFV infection; bovine viral diarrhoea and Akabane viruses (Singh et al, 1982), bluetongue virus (Bower et al, 1982) and Newcastle disease virus (Glass et al, 1974) are also unable to penetrate the zona. However, other viruses can readily cross the zona pellucida, for example Mengo encephalitis virus (Gwatkin, 1963(Gwatkin, , 1967, western equine encephalomyelitis virus (Gwatkin, 1971) and coxsackie B3 virus (Eaglesome et al, 1980).…”
Section: Infection Of Isolated Icm Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%