2014
DOI: 10.1111/ahe.12101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryonic Development of Cuban Gar (Atractosteus tristoechus) Under Laboratory Conditions

Abstract: The embryonic development of Cuban gar (Atractosteus tristoechus) was described under controlled laboratory conditions. During the whole embryogenesis seven periods were defined: the zygote (0-½ h), cleavage (¾-4 h), blastula (5-10 h), gastrula (12-20 h), segmentation (24-40 h), pharyngula (48-66 h) and hatching (72-96 h) periods. The stages were based on morphological features, generally readily identified by examination of the embryo with the dissecting stereomicroscope. Hatching occurred 96 ± 4 h after spaw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent manipulation with zygotes and raising the offspring is not complicated and the similarity of gar and sturgeon eggs should make injecting relatively straightforward. One potentially confounding factor worth mentioning is that gar embryos, like those of lamprey, lack maternal pigmentation, making it difficult to discern when cleavage begins ( Comabella et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent manipulation with zygotes and raising the offspring is not complicated and the similarity of gar and sturgeon eggs should make injecting relatively straightforward. One potentially confounding factor worth mentioning is that gar embryos, like those of lamprey, lack maternal pigmentation, making it difficult to discern when cleavage begins ( Comabella et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent manipulation with zygotes and raising the offspring is not complicated and the similarity of gar and sturgeon eggs should make injecting relatively straightforward. One potentially confounding factor worth mentioning is that gar embryos, like those of lamprey, lack maternal pigmentation, making it difficult to discern when cleavage begins (Comabella et al, 2014). While other non-teleost ray-finned fish species are likely well suited to CRISPR/Cas9 F0 mutagenesis, two key groups of earlydiverging vertebrates, the chondrichthyans, and hagfish, are unlikely to be amenable to this method, at least as described here.…”
Section: Sterlet Is Highly Amenable To Crispr/cas9 F0 Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the onset of yolk sac depletion during development, internal morphological changes occurred to determine the physiological and behavioral capabilities. These changes were successful in optimizing the efficiency of prey capture and increase escape from predators of early life fish survival (Comabella et al, 2013). The present work studied the embryonic developmental stages of Siganus rivulatus from fertilized eggs to yolk sac larval stage after only high dose of hormonal injection at a dose of 100 μg kg -1 LHRHa as a baseline for successful development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concepts directly contribute to estimating fish biomass from length data (Kapiris & Klaoudatos, 2011;Konan, 2017;Randall, 2002;Rodríguez et al, 2017;Sangun et al, 2007), providing a species condition factor (Jisr et al, 2018;Prestes et al, 2019), helping to predict fish feed consumption (Wiff & Roa-Ureta, 2008) and estimate stocking densities under land-base farm-like conditions (Merino et al, 2022). However, allometry also differentiates life-history and morphologic traits, such as growth patterns during early developmental stages (Comabella et al, 2013;Lackmann et al, 2022;Mitra et al, 2016;Osse & Boogaart, 1995;Stoltz et al, 2005) and fish behaviour (Baldauf et al, 2010;Barros et al, 2015;Dunlap et al, 2019;Taugbol et al, 2020), which in turn influence population and community structure and set distinctive spatial, evolutionary and geographical distributions (Davenport, 2003;Furness et al, 2021;Garita-Alvarado & Ornelas-Garcia, 2021;Kapiris & Klaoudatos, 2011;Oliveira et al, 2018;Summers & Ord, 2022;Vega-Trejo et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%