2013 IEEE 11th International Conference on Electronic Measurement &Amp; Instruments 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icemi.2013.6743098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryonic electronics: State of the art and future perspective

Abstract: This paper gives out an overview of embryonic electronics (Embryonics) which provides an entirely new approach to design highly robust integrated circuits inspired by the embryonic development of living beings. After a general introduction of research concerning Embryonics, we investigate the current status of Embryonics, discuss the key technical issues and the challenges i. e. We are facing to develop practical and large-scale Embryonics. In addition, we indicate the areas of interest for future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where P1, P2, P3, P4 = four digital input lines, G is universal quantification of the expression. Level_1 top control logic FC1, FC2 NOT, addition FC3, FC4 delay, OR FC5, FC6 multiplexing, subtraction Level_2 PI controller FC12, FC13 multiplication, addition FC14, FC17 FC15, FC16 comparison, multiplication FC7, FC8 multiplexing Level_3 bottom control logic FC9 delay FC10 addition FC11 subtraction [7,8,29,30]. Table 3 summarises the comparison results when implementing the EDG application with an array of N*N functional cells.…”
Section: Design Practices and Verification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where P1, P2, P3, P4 = four digital input lines, G is universal quantification of the expression. Level_1 top control logic FC1, FC2 NOT, addition FC3, FC4 delay, OR FC5, FC6 multiplexing, subtraction Level_2 PI controller FC12, FC13 multiplication, addition FC14, FC17 FC15, FC16 comparison, multiplication FC7, FC8 multiplexing Level_3 bottom control logic FC9 delay FC10 addition FC11 subtraction [7,8,29,30]. Table 3 summarises the comparison results when implementing the EDG application with an array of N*N functional cells.…”
Section: Design Practices and Verification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overhead Assessment In this section we perform a qualitative comparison of the proposed architecture and comparable systems found in the literature. These reference cases include a voting-bymajority Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) w self-healing architecture, the re-routing self-healing architecture by Lala et al, and the self-healing architecture inspired by the endocrine cellular communication by Yang, I et al [29], [8], [30], [7]. Table 3 summarizes the comparison results when implementing the Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) application with an array of N*N functional cells.…”
Section: Comparative Self-healing Capacity and Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the standpoint of cybernetics and computer science, bio-inspired self-repairing hardware can be considered as a reconfigurable system, which supports a dynamic arrangement of function blocks on the eCell array in response to the interference caused by faults. In this framework, the substitution process is a dynamic placement method where the placement evolves by a series of transitions at run time [7]. Current systems can only generate some predefined fault-free placements from a finite number of initial placements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%