2007
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.21219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryonic stem cells produce neurotrophins in response to cerebral tissue extract: Cell line‐dependent differences

Abstract: In the present study, we compare the capacity of two different embryonic stem (ES) cell lines to secrete neurotrophins in response to cerebral tissue extract derived from healthy or injured rat brains. The intrinsic capacity of the embryonic cell lines BAC7 (feeder cell-dependent cultivation) to release brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) exceeded the release of these factors by CGR8 cells (feeder cell-free growth) by factors of 10 and 4, respectively. Nerve growth factor (NGF) wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a significant disadvantage to the use of ES cells has been the requirement to employ feeder layers of embryonic fibroblasts to support the isolation and maintenance of pluripotential stem cells. The stem cell line CGR8 has already been demonstrated to exhibit similar response pattern as a feeder cell dependent stem cell line [22]. The use of the stem cell line CGR8 thereby allows an unambiguous examination of the effect of the cerebral environment on differentiation in vitro as underlined by the findings reported in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a significant disadvantage to the use of ES cells has been the requirement to employ feeder layers of embryonic fibroblasts to support the isolation and maintenance of pluripotential stem cells. The stem cell line CGR8 has already been demonstrated to exhibit similar response pattern as a feeder cell dependent stem cell line [22]. The use of the stem cell line CGR8 thereby allows an unambiguous examination of the effect of the cerebral environment on differentiation in vitro as underlined by the findings reported in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Conditioning of different embryonic stem cell lines, including the cell line CGR8, with extract from healthy and injured rat brains resulted in a pronounced release of BDNF [22]. However, there was no significant difference in the amount of BDNF release when cells were incubated with TBE or HBE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These advantages include minimal batch-tobatch variability, the high reproducibility of experimental outcomes, the easy standardization of experimental conditions, and the easy upscaling of the hESC cultures. Furthermore, the effects of genetic modifications and chemical treatments on the physiology of the hESCs would not be obscured by alterations in the feeder cell conditions, which are often observed in feeder-dependent hESC cultures [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various interactions between different cell types and the brain microenvironment were reported in several studies (Bentz et al, 2006, 2007, 2010; Molcanyi et al, 2007). We previously showed that incubation of ESCs with brain extract in vitro resulted in the release of neurotrophic factors, which was accompanied by the considerable co-production of these neurotrophins by inactivated co-cultured MEFs (Bentz et al, 2007). The metabolic potential of inactivated feeder cells is not surprising as MEFs are expected to produce humoral factors, which maintain the characteristics of co-cultured ESCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%