We read with interest the paper of Adekambi and coworkers [1] suggesting the reinstatement of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus (A), M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (M) and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii (B) as independent species.This paper is in clear contradiction with our own recent work [2] published in 2016.The claim of the authors (1st page) that postgenomic analysis 'unambiguously supports the reinstatement of species' seems to us at least highly questionable; in none of the studies they cited in their paper [3][4][5][6][7][8], with the exception of one study [9] done in collaboration with the same authors, is the status of subspecies questioned.A major argument supporting the suggestion of Adekambi et al. was published by him in 2008 [10]. The major conclusions of this work were that 1) an rpoB gene similarity 97.7 % correlates with a DNA-DNA Hybridization (DDH) <70 %; and 2) the DDH may be inferred by the formula: 5.98(rpoB similarity)-2516.1.In the 3840 bp sequence of the rpoB gene obtained when the sequences of the type strains of A, B and M (deposited by Adekambi et al. in GenBank; AY147164, AY859692 and AY593981), have been cut to start and end at the same nucleotide positions, we obtained the following similarity values: A versus M=98.07 %; A v B=97.86 %; M v B=98.51 %; each of them corresponding to DDH>70 %.Adekambi et al. questioned our data produced, performing the wet lab DDH test with five replicates [11]. Instead they proposed results (Table 2 of [10]) inferred from rpoB similarity using the above mentioned formula. In our view, it is not valid to replace a complex assay that takes into account the whole genome (which is still considered the gold standard), with a formula based on just a single gene.Bioinformatic algorithms are available and validated in multiple studies, which can be used to infer the DDH from genomic data. The best known, in addition to Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) [12], are the Genome to Genome Distance (GGD) [13,14] and the Genomic Signature-Delta Difference (GS-DD) [15].In our work we calculated the GGD, which is the equivalent in silico of DDH, using the software available at http://ggdc. dsmz.de/ggdc.php and obtained the following DDH-equivalent results: A v M=84.7 %; A v B=86.10 %; M v B=87.70 %; all clearly >70 % and not supportive of the status of independent species [12].We also calculated the GS-DD using the software available at www.cmbl.uga.edu/software/delta-differences.html, which again did not support the hypothesis of independent species (Table 1).We disagree, furthermore, in the assertion of Adekambi at al. (third page) in which we are said to have stated that ANI values >98.3 % are needed to support the status of subspecies. Fig. 1 of our paper [2] reports the results of our analysis of 46 genomes (43 clinical isolates+3 type strains) showing the ANI variability which, among strains belonging to the three taxa (A, B and M), ranged from 96.6 to 97.6 %. Within each single taxon (A or B or M), this variability ranged from 98.5 to 99.9 %. Therefore ...