2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-017-3340-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of a deviating genotype VI pigeon paramyxovirus type-1 isolated from India

Abstract: Pigeon paramyxovirus type 1 (PPMV-1) is an antigenic variant of avian paramyxovirus type 1 (APMV-1), which infects pigeons. The virus causes high morbidity and mortality, creating an alarming state for the poultry industry. The present work describes the molecular and pathogenic characterization of a PPMV-1 strain isolated from pigeon in Bhopal, India. Complete genome sequence analysis revealed a genome of 15,192 nucleotides encoding six genes organized in the order 3'-N-P-M-F-HN-L-5'. The fusion gene sequence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This system was widely adopted, and its use resulted in the identification of three more genotypes (XVI, XVII, and XVIII) (Courtney et al, 2013; Snoeck et al, 2013b). In addition, multiple sub-genotypes have been proposed within many of the existing genotypes (Ahmadi et al, 2016; Byarugaba et al, 2014; Chumbe et al, 2017; Das and Kumar, 2017; Dimitrov et al, 2016b; Esmaelizad et al, 2017; Ganar et al, 2017; He et al, 2018; Miller et al, 2015; Molini et al, 2017; Nath and Kumar, 2017; Ramey et al, 2017; Ramey et al, 2013; Sabouri et al, 2017; Sabra et al, 2017; Servan de Almeida et al, 2013; Snoeck et al, 2013a; Susta et al, 2014; Xue et al, 2017a; Xue et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This system was widely adopted, and its use resulted in the identification of three more genotypes (XVI, XVII, and XVIII) (Courtney et al, 2013; Snoeck et al, 2013b). In addition, multiple sub-genotypes have been proposed within many of the existing genotypes (Ahmadi et al, 2016; Byarugaba et al, 2014; Chumbe et al, 2017; Das and Kumar, 2017; Dimitrov et al, 2016b; Esmaelizad et al, 2017; Ganar et al, 2017; He et al, 2018; Miller et al, 2015; Molini et al, 2017; Nath and Kumar, 2017; Ramey et al, 2017; Ramey et al, 2013; Sabouri et al, 2017; Sabra et al, 2017; Servan de Almeida et al, 2013; Snoeck et al, 2013a; Susta et al, 2014; Xue et al, 2017a; Xue et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other instances, new genotypes were created without applying all of the proposed criteria, or the classification was completed using a limited sequence dataset (often using partial F gene sequences) rather than using a curated dataset of all available complete NDV F gene sequences. For these reasons, there are inconsistencies in the naming and classification of some newly proposed genotypes and some sub-genotypes bear identical names while describing different and unrelated viruses (Ahmadi et al, 2016; Barman et al, 2017; Das and Kumar, 2017; Esmaelizad et al, 2017; Ganar et al, 2017; Gowthaman et al, 2018; Nath and Kumar, 2017; Servan de Almeida et al, 2013; Snoeck et al, 2013a; Xue et al, 2017a). Furthermore, with the increased surveillance efforts and the improvement of sequencing technologies, the amount of available sequences has vastly increased, adding to the already complex challenge of studying the molecular evolution of NDV and the relationships among its isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mAb panel is neither widely available nor commonly used, and not all viruses from genotype VI (and genotype XXI that was created from viruses formerly belonging to genotype VI) have been shown to be PPMV-1. Of note, while the term PPMV-1 has initially been used to designate only the viruses of sub-genotype VI.1.1, it has also been often used for all viruses from genotype VI without evidence that they are indeed PPMV-1 [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is a test that satisfies the requirements for high sensitivity and specificity, coupled with a short turnaround time [4,6,7,11,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%