2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of falsified kinetics as a consequence of multi-particle interactions in dense-phase comminution processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= 0, which conclude the result (11). To extend the interval of solution from [0, t 0 ] to [0, T], consider the equation…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…= 0, which conclude the result (11). To extend the interval of solution from [0, t 0 ] to [0, T], consider the equation…”
Section: Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore, the reaction rate of this is taken to be proportional to the numbers of particle per unit volume of the colliding particles. 1 Nonlinear breakage has significant impact in many engineering processes such as fluidized beds, [2][3][4][5] the bulk distribution of raindrops, [6][7][8][9] comminution systems, [10][11][12][13] and several types of milling process. [14][15][16][17] Binary collisional breakage is the specific case of the nonlinear breakage, one where the breaking behavior is influenced through the sole of collisions between two particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, particle breakage is dependent on the instantaneous PSD due to mechanical interactions amongst feed particles, which results in non-first-order breakage kinetics and a time-variant specific breakage rate constant (Bilgili and Scarlett, 2005;Bilgili et al, 2006). Consideration of the proper breakage kinetics is paramount in modeling and prediction of the PSD for milling processes as shown by previous studies (Capece et al, 2011b(Capece et al, , 2013. While the observation and origination of non-linear breakage kinetics have been discussed at length elsewhere (Bilgili and Scarlett, 2005), most analysis is inferred from process scale modeling since mechanical multi-particle interactions have not been quantified or measured directly in the milling processes.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 95%
“…No PBM can yield accurate parameters in the inverse problem if it does not account for key, fundamental physics such as relevant particle change mechanisms, either mechanistically or phenomenologically (modeling errors). In fact, this is the number one reason for falsified breakage kinetics [9,19,20]. Let us reconsider the underlying assumptions for the PBMs described in Equations ( 1)-( 4).…”
Section: Principle I: Reduce Modeling Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%