2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-022-00902-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of felsic crust and subaerial weathering recorded in Palaeoarchaean barite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.8 Ga, indicating that more zircon grains younger than this age were likely generated from peraluminous crustal magma and/or during a moderate high-pressure fractionation process under horizontal tectonics ( 46 ). Placing a geodynamic transition before the earliest Archean is also supported by other relevant events such as the emergence of weathering and crustal rejuvenation by this time ( 49 52 ). Si and O isotopes are particularly sensitive to surface material recycling ( 11 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3.8 Ga, indicating that more zircon grains younger than this age were likely generated from peraluminous crustal magma and/or during a moderate high-pressure fractionation process under horizontal tectonics ( 46 ). Placing a geodynamic transition before the earliest Archean is also supported by other relevant events such as the emergence of weathering and crustal rejuvenation by this time ( 49 52 ). Si and O isotopes are particularly sensitive to surface material recycling ( 11 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…transition before the earliest Archean is also supported by other relevant events such as the emergence of weathering and crustal rejuvenation by this time (49)(50)(51)(52). Si and O isotopes are particularly sensitive to surface material recycling (11).…”
Section: Earliest Si Isotopic Shift and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Diagenetic processes tend to increase 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values when interstitial fluids are influenced by evolved K-bearing silicates (e.g., Shields and Veizer, 2002;Fairchild et al, 2018), or decrease Sr isotope composition when diagenetic fluids are influenced by mafic components, hydrothermal fluids or pressure solution of older, underlying carbonate rocks (e.g., Miller et al, 2008;Brand et al, 2010;Satkoski et al, 2017;Cui et al, 2020). Unfortunately, the well preserved, low-Mg calcite fossils, widely used in Phanerozoic SIS studies, are not available in Precambrian rocks, and so fine-grained carbonate components (e.g., diagenetic calcite microspar cement; Zhou et al, 2020), bulk carbonate rocks (e.g., micrite; Bailey et al, 2000) or non-carbonate rocks such as barite (e.g., McCulloch, 1994;Satkoski et al, 2016;Roerdink et al, 2022), gypsum or anhydrite (e.g., Kah et al, 2001) and francolite (Li et al, 2011) have all been used instead for this purpose. Apart from diagenetic alteration, the leaching of detrital aluminosilicate phases during sample preparation can also introduce unintended Sr contamination, which is either released by ion exchange during the initial leaching stage or aluminosilicate dissolution during the later leaching process (McArthur, 1994;Bailey et al, 2000;Bellefroid et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagenetic processes tend to increase 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values when interstitial fluids are influenced by evolved K-bearing silicates (e.g., Shields andVeizer 2002, Fairchild et al 2018), or decrease Sr isotope composition when diagenetic fluids are influenced by mafic components, hydrothermal fluids or pressure solution of older, underlying carbonate rocks (e.g., Miller et al 2008, Brand et al 2010, Satkoski et al 2017, Cui et al 2020. Unfortunately, the well preserved, low-Mg calcite fossils, widely used in Phanerozoic SIS studies, are not available in Precambrian rocks, and so fine-grained carbonate components (e.g., diagenetic calcite microspar cement; Zhou et al 2020), bulk carbonate rocks (e.g., micrite; Bailey et al 2000) or non-carbonate rocks such as barite (e.g., McCulloch 1994, Satkoski et al 2016, Roerdink et al 2022, gypsum or anhydrite (e.g., Kah et al 2001) and francolite (Li et al 2011) have all been used instead for this purpose. Apart from diagenetic alteration, the leaching of detrital aluminosilicate phases during sample preparation can also introduce unintended Sr contamination, which is either released by ion exchange during the initial leaching stage or aluminosilicate dissolution during the later leaching process (McArthur 1994, Bailey et al 2000, Bellefroid et al 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016, Roerdink et al . 2022), gypsum or anhydrite (e.g., Kah et al . 2001) and francolite (Li et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%