“…Diagenetic processes tend to increase 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values when interstitial fluids are influenced by evolved K-bearing silicates (e.g., Shields and Veizer, 2002;Fairchild et al, 2018), or decrease Sr isotope composition when diagenetic fluids are influenced by mafic components, hydrothermal fluids or pressure solution of older, underlying carbonate rocks (e.g., Miller et al, 2008;Brand et al, 2010;Satkoski et al, 2017;Cui et al, 2020). Unfortunately, the well preserved, low-Mg calcite fossils, widely used in Phanerozoic SIS studies, are not available in Precambrian rocks, and so fine-grained carbonate components (e.g., diagenetic calcite microspar cement; Zhou et al, 2020), bulk carbonate rocks (e.g., micrite; Bailey et al, 2000) or non-carbonate rocks such as barite (e.g., McCulloch, 1994;Satkoski et al, 2016;Roerdink et al, 2022), gypsum or anhydrite (e.g., Kah et al, 2001) and francolite (Li et al, 2011) have all been used instead for this purpose. Apart from diagenetic alteration, the leaching of detrital aluminosilicate phases during sample preparation can also introduce unintended Sr contamination, which is either released by ion exchange during the initial leaching stage or aluminosilicate dissolution during the later leaching process (McArthur, 1994;Bailey et al, 2000;Bellefroid et al, 2018).…”