Emergence of innovation networks from R&D cooperation with endogenous absorptive capacity

Abstract

This paper extends the existing literature on strategic R&D alliances by resenting a model of innovation networks with endogenous absorptive capacity. The networks emerge as a result of bilateral cooperation over time between firms occupying different locations in the knowledge space. Social capital is ignored, and firms ally purely on the basis of knowledge considerations. Partner selection is driven largely by absorptive capacity which is itself influenced by cognitive distance and investment allocation between inventive and absorptive R&D. Cognitive distance between firms changes as a function of the intensity of cooperation and innovation. Within different knowledge regimes, we examine the structure of networks that emerge and how firms perform within such networks. Our model replicates some stylised empirical results on network structure and the contingent effects of network position on innovative performance. We find networks that exhibit small world properties which are generally robust to changes in the knowledge regime. Second, subject to the extent of knowledge spillovers, certain network strategies such as occupying brokerage positions or maximising accessibility to potential partners pay off. Third and most importantly, absorptive capacity plays an important role in network evolution: firms with different network strategies indeed differ in the build-up of absorptive capacity.Keywords: absorptive capacity; agent-based modeling; cognitive distance; dynamics; innovation; knowledge spillovers; networks

A review of agent‐based modeling of climate‐energy policy

“…ABMs respond to this by describing one or multiple populations of agents with internal diversity in terms of bounded rationality and other‐regarding preferences (De Grauwe, 2011). In addition, many models include social interactions in terms of information sharing or behavioral spillovers (Powell, 1998; Savin & Egbetokun, 2016). This allows addressing important behavioral phenomena, such as conformism, status seeking, and imitation.…”

Dynamic Evolution Model of a Collaborative Innovation Network from the Resource Perspective and an Application Considering Different Government Behaviors

“…Ivan reported that the cognitive distance, cognitive ability, and communication mechanism of the R&D innovation subject are the main factors in a collaborative network structure. The dynamic cooperation is formed through the selection mechanism of knowledge space [21]. Gay and Dousset also stated that the frequency of the entry and exit for enterprises leads to changes to the network, and that the time and spatial boundaries of network construction change as a result [22].…”

It’s a match! Simulating compatibility-based learning in a network of networks

“…In some models, knowledge is exchanged via a barter trade mechanism, meaning that knowledge will only be exchanged if all partners involved can somehow benefit from the exchange (e.g., Cowan and Jonard 2004 ), whereas in others, knowledge may flow freely (see also Klarl 2014 ; Morone and Taylor 2009 , on these different diffusion or transfer mechanisms). In addition, many of the models with an economic focus also incorporate the absorptive capacity 3 of firms, which also influences the diffusion process (e.g., Cowan and Jonard 2004 ; Egbetokun and Savin 2014 ; Savin and Egbetokun 2016 ). For level ‘c) where does it diffuse?’, the modeling approaches to depict the underlying (social) structure range from diffusion or exchange on a grid or von Neumann neighborhood to complex network architectures (e.g., random, small-world, scale-free).…”

“…13Note that alternative conceptualizations of endogenous absorptive capacity have also been proposed, for example, by Klaus Wersching (2010) or Ivan Savin and Abiodun Egbetokun (2016). …”