1996
DOI: 10.2307/201903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence, Self-Organization, and Social Interaction: Arousal-Dependent Structure in Social Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Like those children, the faculty members who are the subjects of this article merged both their biological, as Maturena and Varela (1980) describe in their thesis on autopoiesis, and social needs through the manifestation of self-organizing. As human interaction is a "foundation of social life," Smith and Stevens (1996) argue that self-organizing is a direct product of social activity that takes place within the life of an organization. Organizations typically respond to needs and desires of employees, or in this case of the faculty, but organizational responses tend to be guided by the values of the institution, or the corporate epistemology (Von Krogh, Roos, & Slocum, 1994), rather than by the organic impulses of the institutions' employees.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like those children, the faculty members who are the subjects of this article merged both their biological, as Maturena and Varela (1980) describe in their thesis on autopoiesis, and social needs through the manifestation of self-organizing. As human interaction is a "foundation of social life," Smith and Stevens (1996) argue that self-organizing is a direct product of social activity that takes place within the life of an organization. Organizations typically respond to needs and desires of employees, or in this case of the faculty, but organizational responses tend to be guided by the values of the institution, or the corporate epistemology (Von Krogh, Roos, & Slocum, 1994), rather than by the organic impulses of the institutions' employees.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthur 1999; Foley Duncan 2003; Rihani 2002; Simpson 2000), sociology (e.g. Smith and Stevens 1996), climatology (e.g. Rind 1999), neuroscience (e.g.…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Smith and Stevens (1996) demonstrate the explanatory potential of just such an expansive multi‐scalar analysis. By integrating cognitive science, developmental psychology and sociology, this fascinating work explores the causal linkages between neuro‐chemical pathways, the formation of infant–parent bonds and community‐level processes of socialisation, without arbitrarily privileging one organisational scale over another. …”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, sociologist Thomas Smith (1992Smith & Stevens, 1996) has taken up this challenge by using self-organization theory to integrate psychological and biological research into a sociological theory of the development of self and society, which acts as his foundation for uniting Weberian and Durkheimian social theory in what he refers to as "nonequilibrium functionalism" (1992, p. 243). Smith argues that the self evolves as a self-organizing system in a sociobiologically based tension between two reflexive somatic states, generated and maintained by the opiod and noradrenergic hormone systems.…”
Section: Powerlessness and The Prerational Affinity For Ecological Comentioning
confidence: 99%