Emergence in Mind 2010
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583621.003.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence vs. Reduction in Chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principle of ubiquity does not entail that physical principles determine or fix every physical effect. This principle is compatible with emergentism and downward causation (Hendry 2010, pp. 217ff, Cartwright 1999.…”
Section: Why a Naturalist Should Be An Emergentist About The Mind  53mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The principle of ubiquity does not entail that physical principles determine or fix every physical effect. This principle is compatible with emergentism and downward causation (Hendry 2010, pp. 217ff, Cartwright 1999.…”
Section: Why a Naturalist Should Be An Emergentist About The Mind  53mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Citing Woolley and Sutcliffe's symmetry problem, Robin Hendry offers evidence that explanations of chemical structure and bonding involve configurational Hamiltonians. Hendry (2010) argues that reductive physicalism has to posit a mechanism for symmetry-breaking, for which there is no independent evidence beyond the assumption of the completeness of physics or causal closure (to which I shall return below). And Silberstein and McGeever, as well as Campbell and Humphreys argue for evidence for ontological emergence within quantum mechanics and, by extension, as a real feature of the natural world.…”
Section: Why a Naturalist Should Be An Emergentist About The Mind  53mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hendry does not explicitly state what notion of causation he has in mind with reference to DC. He proposes a ‘nomological formulation of emergentism’ which suggests that DC is at least supported (if not understood) in terms of nomological sufficiency ( 2010a : 218). On the other hand, Hendry examines DC with respect to Kim’s examination of the overdetermination problem and of the CCP.…”
Section: The Strong Emergence Of Molecular Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this criterion, ‘a system exhibits downward causation if its behaviour would be different were it determined by the more basic laws governing the stuff of which it is made’ (Hendry 2010b : 189). He claims this criterion is satisfied in the case of molecular structure given how quantum mechanics describes it, which is as follows: A molecule is described by the Coulombic Schrödinger equation which is constructed by employing the so-called ‘resultant Hamiltonian’ (Hendry 2010a : 210–211, 213). The resultant Hamiltonian takes into account all the intra-molecular interactions, and it is constructed using as input only fundamental physical interactions and the value of the physical properties of the entities (i.e.…”
Section: The Strong Emergence Of Molecular Structurementioning
confidence: 99%