2017
DOI: 10.1111/ans.14088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency appendicectomy in Australia: findings from a multicentre, prospective study

Abstract: The NAR found in this study is within the traditional measures of acceptance; however, this rate is high when measured against modern international benchmarks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
34
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from our study also highlighted the increased utilization of imaging over the past 10 years for patients with suspected appendicitis prior to surgery, with a slight decrease in the negative appendicectomy rate from 17.3% to 14.4% that was not statistically significant. Our contemporary data are comparable to the results of a recent large Australian multicentre prospective cross‐sectional study, which showed an overall imaging utilization rate of 64.7% and negative appendicectomy rate of 19.0% . In contrast, recent nationwide data from the USA showed a computed tomography utilization rate of 86.1%, overall imaging utilization rate of 93.9% and a negative appendicectomy rate of 4.5% .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from our study also highlighted the increased utilization of imaging over the past 10 years for patients with suspected appendicitis prior to surgery, with a slight decrease in the negative appendicectomy rate from 17.3% to 14.4% that was not statistically significant. Our contemporary data are comparable to the results of a recent large Australian multicentre prospective cross‐sectional study, which showed an overall imaging utilization rate of 64.7% and negative appendicectomy rate of 19.0% . In contrast, recent nationwide data from the USA showed a computed tomography utilization rate of 86.1%, overall imaging utilization rate of 93.9% and a negative appendicectomy rate of 4.5% .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our contemporary data are comparable to the results of a recent large Australian multicentre prospective cross-sectional study, which showed an overall imaging utilization rate of 64.7% and negative appendicectomy rate of 19.0%. 23 In contrast, recent nationwide data from the USA showed a computed tomography utilization rate of 86.1%, overall imaging utilization rate of 93.9% and a negative appendicectomy rate of 4.5%. 24 It is possible that clinical practice in Australia may follow suit, for better or worse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Various imaging modalities are increasingly being used in the investigation of abdominal pain and higher rates of pre-operative imaging is shown to reduce negative appendicectomy rates. 6 This case highlights the complexity of presentations of abdominal or scrotal pain, which is further compounded when multiple pathologies are present simultaneously. Clinical acumen plays an important role in diagnosis and decisions regarding potential surgical intervention, and when there are incongruities between the clinical picture and initial investigations, it is an important flagging point for further evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Various imaging modalities are increasingly being used in the investigation of abdominal pain and higher rates of pre‐operative imaging is shown to reduce negative appendicectomy rates . This case highlights the complexity of presentations of abdominal or scrotal pain, which is further compounded when multiple pathologies are present simultaneously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it does pose significant risks, with complications occurring in up to 10% of patients. 6 The prophylaxis use of antibiotics has been shown to reduce infective complications of appendicectomy. 3 The role of surgical prophylaxis antibiotics for appendicectomy is supported in national guidelines (Therapeutic Guidelines, 2015), which recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic appendicectomy, with cessation post-operatively if not perforated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%