2020
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency department use during COVID-19 as described by syndromic surveillance

Abstract: On 12 March 2020 the UK entered the ‘delay phase’ of the COVID-19 pandemic response. The Public Health England Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance System (EDSSS) carries out daily (near real-time) public health surveillance of emergency department (ED) attendances across England. This retrospective observational analysis of EDSSS data aimed to describe changes in ED attendances during March–April 2020, and identify the attendance types with the largest impact. Type 1 ED attendances were selected from 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
67
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As COVID-19 cases increased and further restrictions were implemented, health-seeking behaviour changed dramatically in England, with health service attendances decreasing from week 12 across all syndromic indictors [1,[18][19][20][21][22]. Similar decreases were observed internationally, with speculation that reduced healthcare usage was due to public avoidance, with some evidence that those with milder symptoms were least likely to seek care [3][4][5][6][7]23]. However, behavioural surveys conducted during late lockdown and lockdown easing found 70-80% of participants had continued to seek care, if needed [24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As COVID-19 cases increased and further restrictions were implemented, health-seeking behaviour changed dramatically in England, with health service attendances decreasing from week 12 across all syndromic indictors [1,[18][19][20][21][22]. Similar decreases were observed internationally, with speculation that reduced healthcare usage was due to public avoidance, with some evidence that those with milder symptoms were least likely to seek care [3][4][5][6][7]23]. However, behavioural surveys conducted during late lockdown and lockdown easing found 70-80% of participants had continued to seek care, if needed [24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We applaud Lai et al in this Letter to the Editor for exploring changes in acute care utilization in Taiwan related to COVID-19. Their result, that ED visits fell by between 21.3% and 36.3% compared to prior years during the Lunar New Year Holiday in 2020, and that they fell by even larger margins for influenza-like-illnesses, is comparable to findings from the United States [ 1 , 2 ], the UK [ 3 ], and Japan [ 4 ]. In Taiwan, COVID-19 control measures likely contributed to a change in the baseline population incidence of pathologies with infectious etiology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…There have concomitant decreases in ED visits for adults during the pandemic and concern that adult patients with serious illnesses are delaying care. 9 Over time volumes are likely to return to normal. However, it is unclear how long this pandemic will last, and there is potential for surges to recur in a cyclical fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%