1966
DOI: 10.1080/00028896609342815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Exposure Limits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AIHA EEL: Emergency Exposure Level published in the American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal (Frawley et al 1964). The concentrations of contaminant that can be tolerated without adversely affecting health but not necessarily without acute discomfort or other evidence of irritation or intoxication.…”
Section: Acgih Tlv Ceilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AIHA EEL: Emergency Exposure Level published in the American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal (Frawley et al 1964). The concentrations of contaminant that can be tolerated without adversely affecting health but not necessarily without acute discomfort or other evidence of irritation or intoxication.…”
Section: Acgih Tlv Ceilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AIHA EEL: Emergency Exposure Level published in the AIHA Journal (Frawley et al 1964). This is the concentration of contaminant that can be tolerated without adversely affecting health but not necessarily without acute discomfort or other evidence of irritation or intoxication.…”
Section: Glossary For Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All currently available standards and guidelines are shown in Table 47. Frawley (1964) provided a summary of data relevant for the derivation of emergency exposure levels (EELs) for 1,1-dimethylhydrazine. The EELs are Numeric values for AEGL-1 are not recommended because (1) the lack of available data, (2) data indicate that toxic effects may occur at or below the odor threshold, (3) the inadequate margin of safety that exists between the derived AEGL-1 and the AEGL-2, or (4) the derived AEGL-1 is greater than the AEGL-2.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Standards and Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%