2002
DOI: 10.1197/aemj.9.5.484-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Medicine Animal Research: Does Lack of Blinding or Randomization Bias the Results?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rats subjected to PE demonstrated a significant decrease in peak partial pressure of carbon dioxide measured at end-tidal respiration (PetCO 2 ) and an increase in the nadir end-tidal partial pressure of oxygen measurement (PetO 2 ), coincident with increased V D /V T alv (Fig. 5A) and significantly increased the difference between the PetO 2 and the arterial PO 2 (Fig. 5B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats subjected to PE demonstrated a significant decrease in peak partial pressure of carbon dioxide measured at end-tidal respiration (PetCO 2 ) and an increase in the nadir end-tidal partial pressure of oxygen measurement (PetO 2 ), coincident with increased V D /V T alv (Fig. 5A) and significantly increased the difference between the PetO 2 and the arterial PO 2 (Fig. 5B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%