2014
DOI: 10.1177/0009922813517170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Medicine Physicians’ and Pediatricians’ Use of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Pediatric Patients With Abdominal Pain Without Trauma in a Community Hospital

Abstract: There is a paucity of data regarding emergency department (ED) provider type and computed tomography (CT) scan use in the evaluation of pediatric patients with abdominal pain without trauma. The purpose of this retrospective single community hospital study was to determine if there was a difference in CT use between emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) and pediatricians (PEDs) in all patients younger than 18 years with abdominal pain without trauma who presented to the ED during the study period. The study inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stanley et al 52 Physician training type was associated with variability in CT use, with the greatest overall rate of CT use in physicians with emergency medicine training alone, and the lowest overall rate of CT use in paediatric residents.…”
Section: Physician Training Typementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stanley et al 52 Physician training type was associated with variability in CT use, with the greatest overall rate of CT use in physicians with emergency medicine training alone, and the lowest overall rate of CT use in paediatric residents.…”
Section: Physician Training Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher CT scan rate of 2-2.4 fold was shown in general hospital EDs. 39,50 Stanley et al 52 demonstrated a substantial variation in the use of head CT in children presenting to the ED with minor TBI, across 25 general EDs in the USA. This variation was not explained by the rate of positive CT scans, or by the severity clinical findings, implying overuse of CT. Children with low to middle risk received head CT scans at higher rates in suburban hospitals and non-children hospitals.…”
Section: Head Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, because there was no detailed hospital information in the database, our study was unable to evaluate the factors used in previous studies, such as children's hospitals, teaching hospitals, and emergency hospitals. 32,33,[41][42][43][44] Finally, we did not consider the history of CT use, which might affect the choice of CT use. Because of cumulative radiation exposure, physicians may hesitate to perform repeated CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those unlikely, 9.1% [4] were abnormal and 11.4% [5] were equivocal. Of those equivocal, 8.9% [4] were abnormal and 15.6% [7] were equivocal.…”
Section: Likelihood Of Positive Findings On Axrmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, AXR remains the initial modality used in many occasions [5]. Studies have shown variability in the ordering rates of imaging studies among different groups of providers but no outcome differences have been demonstrated [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%