2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Medicine Resident Anesthesia Training in a Private vs. Academic Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the OR, there frequently are many learners requiring the same access to clinical cases limiting the exposure of individual trainees. In a comparison of an academic versus private practice anesthesiology rotation, Fix and colleagues [ 61 ] found that a private practice rotation provided significantly more experience (average 4.6 vs 1.5 intubations, respectively, per day in the OR). From the perspective of anesthesiology training programs, there is only 1 report on the effectiveness of training nonanesthesiologists in the OR [ 58 ].…”
Section: Where Should This Take Place and Who Should Be Teaching?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the OR, there frequently are many learners requiring the same access to clinical cases limiting the exposure of individual trainees. In a comparison of an academic versus private practice anesthesiology rotation, Fix and colleagues [ 61 ] found that a private practice rotation provided significantly more experience (average 4.6 vs 1.5 intubations, respectively, per day in the OR). From the perspective of anesthesiology training programs, there is only 1 report on the effectiveness of training nonanesthesiologists in the OR [ 58 ].…”
Section: Where Should This Take Place and Who Should Be Teaching?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources of funding were as follows: five federal (two NIH, one Canada, and one Taiwan), five universitysponsored, two industry-supported, and two organizationally funded. Research methodology included 17 surveys (36%), 17,19,21,25,30,31,33,37,40,42,46,[50][51][52]54,60,61 15 (31%) observational analyses, [14][15][16]22,23,27,32,33,38,44,47,49,56,57,59 and three (6%) qualitative methodology studies. 19,28,45 There were only 12 (25%) with an experimental or quasi-experimental study design, 20,24,26,35,36,39,41,43,48,53,55,57 with five of the highlighted articles using this rigorous design.…”
Section: Trends In Medical Education Research In 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%