2021
DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency medicine residents spend over 7.5 months of their 3‐year residency on the electronic health record

Abstract: Background: Use of the electronic health record (EHR) is a standard component of modern patient care. Although EHRs have improved since inception, cumbersome workflows decrease the time for residents to spend on clinical and educational activities. This study aims to quantify the time spent interacting with the EHR during a 3-year emergency medicine (EM) residency. Methods: System records of time spent actively engaged in EHR use were analyzed for 98 unique EM residents over a period of 5 years from July 2015 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 75 , 93 , 94 , 113 Only one of the experimental studies was a randomized controlled trial. 75 Across both observational and experimental studies, 41 articles compared EHR use across different groups of users including comparisons by specialty (14 studies), 4 , 7 , 25 , 29 , 31 , 36 , 42 , 48 , 51 , 58 , 59 , 85 , 105 , 115 clinical role (12), 24 , 26 , 33 , 37 , 46 , 65 , 76 , 95 , 99 , 106 , 108 , 115 gender (8), 19 , 34 , 47 , 49 , 66 , 68 , 70 , 106 year in residency (8), 31 , 32 , 35 , 39 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 95 organization (3), 24 , 44 , 75 and country (1). 27 Vendor-measure studies were more likely than investigator-measure studies to make such comparisons of EHR use by user group (65% vs 25...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 75 , 93 , 94 , 113 Only one of the experimental studies was a randomized controlled trial. 75 Across both observational and experimental studies, 41 articles compared EHR use across different groups of users including comparisons by specialty (14 studies), 4 , 7 , 25 , 29 , 31 , 36 , 42 , 48 , 51 , 58 , 59 , 85 , 105 , 115 clinical role (12), 24 , 26 , 33 , 37 , 46 , 65 , 76 , 95 , 99 , 106 , 108 , 115 gender (8), 19 , 34 , 47 , 49 , 66 , 68 , 70 , 106 year in residency (8), 31 , 32 , 35 , 39 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 95 organization (3), 24 , 44 , 75 and country (1). 27 Vendor-measure studies were more likely than investigator-measure studies to make such comparisons of EHR use by user group (65% vs 25...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2–4 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 31 , 34–36 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43–46 , 48–50 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 59 , 62 , 66 , 69–71 , 79 , 95 The next most popular denominators were number of appointments (12 articles), 24 , 25 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 35 , 38 , 40 , 42 , 44 , 72 , 77 and patients (9 articles). 26 , 31 , 39 , 41 , 51 , 53 , 56 , 57 , 98 Eleven other denominators were also used including EHR time per hour of clinic, per 8 h of clinic, per clinic session, per shift, per week, per month, per quarter, per year, per procedure, per note, and per residency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation