2012
DOI: 10.1056/nejmvcm0907841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Pericardiocentesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…40 Also on the chest there may be incisions from drain insertion or puncture marks from the use of cannulae to decompress pneumothoraces 37,41 or from emergency pericardiocentesis. 42 Fractures of the ribs and sternum are the most commonly encountered internal resuscitation injuries 13,36 ; however the range of their reported incidence 43 may relate to the method of their detection. Rib fractures become more likely with age and are encountered anterior to the mid-axillary line.…”
Section: Chestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Also on the chest there may be incisions from drain insertion or puncture marks from the use of cannulae to decompress pneumothoraces 37,41 or from emergency pericardiocentesis. 42 Fractures of the ribs and sternum are the most commonly encountered internal resuscitation injuries 13,36 ; however the range of their reported incidence 43 may relate to the method of their detection. Rib fractures become more likely with age and are encountered anterior to the mid-axillary line.…”
Section: Chestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be adopted in hemodynamically unstable patients, in intensive care units or in patients who are unsuitable for surgery due to poor clinical conditions. It is well-tolerated in all age groups, including children (23), and it can be quickly performed in unstable patients to relieve symptoms (24). Moreover, it presents low mortality, low complications, but high recurrence rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echo-guided pericardiocentesis, performed via sub-xiphoid, apical or parasternal approach, has smaller risk of major complication than blind pericardiocentesis. [1][2][3] The sub-xiphoid approach is considered the safest. 2,3 In our patient this approach was attempted but was not feasible, probably because of the anatomy and the fibrosis due to both previous radiation exposure and the recent surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The sub-xiphoid approach is considered the safest. 2,3 In our patient this approach was attempted but was not feasible, probably because of the anatomy and the fibrosis due to both previous radiation exposure and the recent surgery. In this particular case, the apical approach was a very high-risk procedure in view of the previous right pneumonectomy and the risk of left pneumothorax, which could be life-threating in a patient with only the left lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%