2021
DOI: 10.1177/19375867211001379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Physicians’ Workstation Design: An Observational Study of Interruptions and Perception of Collaboration During Shift-End Handoffs

Abstract: Background: Frequent external interruptions and lack of collaboration among team members are known to be common barriers in end-of-shift handoffs between physicians in the emergency department. In spite of being the primary location for this crucial and cognitively demanding task, workstations are not designed to limit barriers and support handoffs. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine handoff characteristics, actual and perceived interruptions, and perceived collaboration among emergency physici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical environmental strategies suggested to mitigate interruptions go hand in hand with improving privacy, including developing “no interruption” zones or quiet rooms locating medication dispensing machines in closed versus open areas (Chaudhury et al, 2009), designing enclosed physician workstations (Joshi et al, 2021), and incorporating private workspaces as well as glass partitions between care team areas (Gunn et al, 2015). Despite a high emphasis on teamwork, collaboration, and communication in healthcare design literature (Morley & Cashell, 2017; Schneider, 2012), findings about high levels of interruptions and their negative consequences in the healthcare environments (Blocker et al, 2017; Monteiro et al, 2015) call for revisiting open work environments and seeking solutions that achieve a balance between collaboration and concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical environmental strategies suggested to mitigate interruptions go hand in hand with improving privacy, including developing “no interruption” zones or quiet rooms locating medication dispensing machines in closed versus open areas (Chaudhury et al, 2009), designing enclosed physician workstations (Joshi et al, 2021), and incorporating private workspaces as well as glass partitions between care team areas (Gunn et al, 2015). Despite a high emphasis on teamwork, collaboration, and communication in healthcare design literature (Morley & Cashell, 2017; Schneider, 2012), findings about high levels of interruptions and their negative consequences in the healthcare environments (Blocker et al, 2017; Monteiro et al, 2015) call for revisiting open work environments and seeking solutions that achieve a balance between collaboration and concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As defined by Ratwani and colleagues (2017), any event initiated by an outside stimulus requiring the physician to direct his or her attention away from the current task was considered an interruption. An iPad-based template was created to observe and capture the number and sources of face-to-face interruptions (Table 3) experienced by physicians during each phase of the handoff (details provided in Joshi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handoff between an outgoing and incoming physician typically includes four phases—(a) handoff preparation, (b) arrival, (c) exchange and dialogue, (d) post-handoff (Cheung et al, 2010; Wears et al, 2004). During handoffs, physicians engage in focused tasks such as computer work to interpret reports, place medication or lab orders, and dictate notes (Fong & Ratwani, 2018; Joshi et al, 2021). Collaborative tasks include answering phone calls and face-to-face communication with clinicians involved in the handoff until a “mutually satisfactory and contextually appropriate degree of understanding” is reached about the patient cases (Cheung et al, 2010; Fong & Ratwani, 2018; Joshi et al, 2021; Perry et al, 2008; Wears et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations